Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #623511

Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity
Date Sun, 29 Oct 2023 01:36:09 -0700
Organization To protect and to server
Message-ID <653E1978.14B1@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References <8e2c5061-91c4-4162-8bc2-22da1c229e92n@googlegroups.com> <653A0077.7C40@ix.netcom.com> <fb1241b3-98d0-4700-a1f1-c49984e3c0afn@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Injection-Info paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="3015185"; posting-host="nLYg9UBeoMWa070gP9wQcw.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A";
Cancel-Lock sha256:fBnxm+guLm5t6i185gXVpuiGvGbs8U3mgSDxlvt2YEM=
X-Notice Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3
X-Antivirus-Status Clean
X-Antivirus Avast (VPS 231029-0, 10/28/2023), Outbound message
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
Xref csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:623511

Show key headers only | View raw


Ken Seto wrote:
> 
> On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 2:00:01 AM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Ken Seto wrote:
> > >
> > > Their failures are based on the following faulty assumptions:
> > > 1. Every SR observer is faultily assumed to be in a state of absolute rest in space (the aether or the E-Matrix). And thus every SR observer faultily assumes that a clock moving wrt him is running slower. In real life a clock moving wrt the observer is accumulating clock seconds at a slower rate of 1/gamma or faster rate of gamma.
> > >
> > > 2. I have formulated a complete theory of relativity called IRT. IRT is included in My book: Model Mechanics :The Final Theory.
> > >
> > > 3. Please read my book before comment.
> > >
> > > Thank you ,
> > > Ken Seto
> > >
> > >
> > can you post a link, please?
> >
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unmet website that contains the linkaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge the unchallengeable.
> 
> For reasons unknown, Microsoft destroyed my website  that contains the link for my book. I tried to reactiveate the site but failed.
> However, Amazon saw the value of my book and they post my book in their site. I can open their link as follows:
> Amazon_Book Online(1).pdf
> If you can't get the book in the above link, I can email it to you.
> 
> Ken Seto


"reactiveate"???? Don't you mean find a host for your website name?

The Truth is you own the website name you, just don't have anybody hosting it now. It's PARKED.


But, telling you dat is hopeless.


Do you still need these files?


http://web.archive.org/web/20211208033204/http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf

http://web.archive.org/web/20161106112001/http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015irt.pdf



(don't tell Bill Gates)





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Scientists failed to  understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-10-23 10:42 -0700
  Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-10-23 10:54 -0700
  Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-10-23 13:22 -0500
    Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-10-27 15:33 -0700
      Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-10-27 18:01 -0500
        Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-10-27 16:57 -0700
        Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-10-27 23:27 -0700
        Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-10-30 13:15 -0700
          Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Jean Shakhbanov <anbn@bnssbask.ss> - 2023-10-30 20:54 +0000
            Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-11-01 08:32 -0700
              Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Jhon Jhairo Tomashov <jnjh@aviohvha.jo> - 2023-11-01 16:36 +0000
              Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Dimingo Bakunoff <ifka@fauofnko.oi> - 2023-11-01 16:47 +0000
      Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Nicholas Batunov <scso@ivonthou.aa> - 2023-10-28 12:46 +0000
    Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-11-05 05:56 -0800
      Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Witar Bagimoff <aatm@ramamtrw.bw> - 2023-11-05 15:03 +0000
      Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-11-05 09:03 -0600
        Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-11-05 08:20 -0800
          Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Michaes Yakuba <hiku@uasyhauk.is> - 2023-11-05 17:05 +0000
          Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-11-05 21:33 -0600
            Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-05 21:59 -0800
            Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-11-06 08:52 -0800
        Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-05 09:30 -0800
          Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-11-05 21:35 -0600
            Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-05 21:57 -0800
              Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-11-06 12:35 -0500
                Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-06 10:04 -0800
        Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-11-06 15:52 -0700
          Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-11-06 17:36 -0600
            Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-06 22:48 -0800
            Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-11-08 12:58 -0700
          Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Drake Badanov <roen@kvvodbaa.rb> - 2023-11-07 00:14 +0000
          Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-11-07 14:52 -0800
  Re: Scientists failed to  understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Romano Baibikov <koko@ooroonon.ao> - 2023-10-23 18:56 +0000
    Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-10-23 15:19 -0400
      Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Bernabe Badanoff <ndab@faaabnbn.en> - 2023-10-23 19:52 +0000
  Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-10-24 02:48 -0700
    Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-10-27 15:41 -0700
      Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-10-27 20:55 -0700
        Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-10-28 00:07 -0700
        Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-11-01 08:23 -0700
        Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-11-01 13:12 -0700
          Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Jon Michael Jatzyshin <moin@snajanli.nc> - 2023-11-01 21:42 +0000
            Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-11-01 20:13 -0700
            Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-11-03 08:32 -0700
              Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Shain Baumgarten <gnii@eaehssaa.ma> - 2023-11-03 16:14 +0000
                Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-11-04 06:08 -0700
                Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Rigoberto Marholenko <root@rtobotll.bg> - 2023-11-04 20:22 +0000
    Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-10-30 12:46 -0700
  Re: Scientists failed to  understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an  incomplete theory of relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-10-25 23:00 -0700
    Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-10-27 16:33 -0700
      Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity Theofane Beltsov <atlo@tnoveovt.eb> - 2023-10-28 13:02 +0000
      Re: Scientists failed to understand that Einstein's (SRT) is an incomplete theory of relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-10-29 01:36 -0700

csiph-web