Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #603573
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The Emporer Has No Clothes |
| Date | 2023-03-10 10:52 -0800 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <640B7C8A.4FA8@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <fdc6bd7e-7564-426d-ba59-2e0a697a0599n@googlegroups.com> <8058dd04-0174-4b47-bb01-2b043d05f64fn@googlegroups.com> |
Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Sunday, March 5, 2023 at 10:20:58 PM UTC-8, Foos Research wrote: > > > You can no longer match the claims made in my book with the current wiki article. The good news is that the original website was saved as a PDF and will be appended to the book PDF. I will update the current Amazon book if allowed, which I think won't be a problem. Meanwhile, the anti Einsteins in the group have been emboldened and are speaking up. Here you have the correct cause of gravity and redshift: > I am reading Al Foos's fascinating book criticizing relativity, particularly the P&R, employing his knowledge of calculus which I lack. He is very informative. However, he seems to think the expanding universe occurs within the solar system. This is not believed by the consensus of authorities. He also seems to think that the definition of a meter based on the speed of light requires adjusting the meter for the accelerations in the P&R. This does not follow because the unit of measure is based o "consensus of authorities"???? There is no such thing as a consensus of authorities, ...you must be talking about Yourself. (fascinating book)...and then he cuts his throat. same MO. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Emporer Has No Clothes Foos Research <cusanusnicolas@gmail.com> - 2023-03-05 22:20 -0800
Re: The Emporer Has No Clothes Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-03-06 10:41 -0800
Re: The Emporer Has No Clothes Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-07 01:43 -0500
Re: The Emporer Has No Clothes Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-03-07 06:08 -0800
Re: Al Foos Has No Clues "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-06 10:48 -0800
Re: Al Foos Has No Clues nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-03-06 22:23 +0100
Re: The Emporer Has No Clothes Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-03-06 15:54 -0800
Re: The Emporer Has No Clothes Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-03-06 15:58 -0800
Re: The Emporer Has No Clothes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-07 12:10 -0800
Re: The Emporer Has No Clothes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-08 22:30 -0800
Re: The Emporer Has No Clothes Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-03-10 08:16 -0800
Re: The Emporer Has No Clothes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-10 10:52 -0800
Re: The Emporer Has No Clothes Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-03-10 20:24 -0800
csiph-web