Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #603397
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: The Emporer Has No Clothes |
| Date | 2023-03-08 22:30 -0800 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <64097D0F.48B3@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <fdc6bd7e-7564-426d-ba59-2e0a697a0599n@googlegroups.com> <64079A37.2F3E@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
The Starmaker wrote: > > Foos Research wrote: > > > > > > You can no longer match the claims made in my book with the current wiki article. The good news is that the original website was saved as a PDF and will be appended to the book PDF. I will update the current Amazon book if allowed, which I think won't be a problem. Meanwhile, the anti Einsteins in the group have been emboldened and are speaking up. Here you have the correct cause of gravity and redshift: > > The cause of redshift has nothing to do with shift of red... > > redshift is simply a sign of death. > > any shift of red means ...dying. > > For example, all planets with a red suface means that planet is dead. > > I know that this is differcult for yous to understand.. > but the redshift is caused by ...decay, death of stars. > Inbetween all galaxies are only red stars. (decay, death) > All surfaces of planets out there are only one color...Red. They are all > dead planets. > > Pluto is a red planet. It's dead. > > You bleed Red..you bleed red to death. > > Red is dead. > > Know your colors. > > Which color means ...Life? > > Red is dead. I forgot to make it clear...*All* the surfaces of the planets out there are only one color...Red. They are all dead planets. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Emporer Has No Clothes Foos Research <cusanusnicolas@gmail.com> - 2023-03-05 22:20 -0800
Re: The Emporer Has No Clothes Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-03-06 10:41 -0800
Re: The Emporer Has No Clothes Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-07 01:43 -0500
Re: The Emporer Has No Clothes Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-03-07 06:08 -0800
Re: Al Foos Has No Clues "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-06 10:48 -0800
Re: Al Foos Has No Clues nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-03-06 22:23 +0100
Re: The Emporer Has No Clothes Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-03-06 15:54 -0800
Re: The Emporer Has No Clothes Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-03-06 15:58 -0800
Re: The Emporer Has No Clothes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-07 12:10 -0800
Re: The Emporer Has No Clothes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-08 22:30 -0800
Re: The Emporer Has No Clothes Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-03-10 08:16 -0800
Re: The Emporer Has No Clothes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-10 10:52 -0800
Re: The Emporer Has No Clothes Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-03-10 20:24 -0800
csiph-web