Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #598975

Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

A leader of the Manhattan Project recalls a discussion of whether the Trinity test would ignite Earth's atmosphere and destroy the planet

The 70th anniversary of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has reminded me of an extraordinary incident that occurred during the Manhattan Project, 
when Edward Teller and other physicists feared the fission bomb they were building might incinerate the planet
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/bethe-teller-trinity-and-the-end-of-earth/



These scientists will blow up the planet Earth while you're watching Netflix.


Trust the Science.






The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2011/09/14/the-physics-and-economics-of-blowing-up-a-planet/
> 
> If you want to vaporize the Earth—and, really, who doesn't?—then
> you will need about 2 x 1032 Joules. A Joule is a tiny amount of energy,
> but 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 of them add up.
> 
> But it's hard to grasp what that really means, so maybe we need to translate this into
> more understandable units. Hey, got a one-megaton nuclear bomb handy?
> You'll need 57 quadrillion (5.7 x 1016) more if you want to blow up the planet.
> 
> Trust the Science.
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Albert Einstein was probably the first scientist that talked about blowing up the whole planet earth:
> > "... a chain reaction of a scope great enough to destroy part or all of this planet." --Albert Einstein
> >
> > (albert einstein resume put all together is all about bombs!)
> >
> > But, what about all the other scientist thinking about blowing up the earth?
> >
> > This scientists wants to start by blowing up our Moon first:
> >
> > What would happen if we blew up the Moon? It drags along oceans creating the tide, it alters our tilt, but do we really need it? One professor from America thought absolutely not.
> > Destroying the Moon was mathematics professor at Iowa State University Alexander Abian’s unconventional cure all for life’s struggles, as he
> > believed that blowing up our planetary pal would solve virtually every problem of human existence. He put forward this Moonless Earth Theory in 1991 in a campus newspaper.
> >
> > "You make a big hole by deep drilling, and you put there atomic explosive," People reports Abian wrote. "And you detonate it – by remote control from Earth."
> > https://www.iflscience.com/the-professor-who-wanted-to-blow-up-the-moon-to-solve-all-of-lifes-problems-63325
> >
> > wat about the 'other' scientist?
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > But this is the New Year 2023...I want to know How To Blow Up The Whole Planet Earth?
> > >
> > > Are you science guys working at it????
> > >
> > > You guys mess up this planet.
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > https://books.google.com/books/publisher/content?id=beczEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT103&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&bul=1&sig=ACfU3U0doVFp-NdYMPAN4NynNdyiGgubPw&w=1280
> > > >
> > > > I cannot find any assocation from Charles Manson and the Sharon Tate murders. He had nothing to do with it.
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:40:05 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 10:45:38 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The cretin's work is completely unrelated to the A-bomb. Fermi said it, Oppenheimer said it and Serber wrote a book about it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Are you naive?, it was a top-secret operation which means you were not
> > > > > > > suppose to talk about it
> > > > > > > to others outside the project. Who would admit to talking to Einstein
> > > > > > > about all the work being done?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Oppenheimer was eventually fired for releasing top-secret info...others
> > > > > > > got the electric chair.
> > > > > > > Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly
> > > > > > > connected.
> > > > > > > That means he used...liaisons.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > a buffer. he used buffers.
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > > > and challenge
> > > > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You have a wicked way of representing that man.
> > > > > > After WW2 Einstein wanted no association to the bomb.
> > > > > > He knew if Hitler developed it that would be the most danger
> > > > > > to the world. He never liked the government decision
> > > > > > to use it over the Japanese.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > > > >
> > > > > "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
> > > > > formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess in his heart he always wanted to kill Germans.
> > > > >
> > > > > Even after the ww2 ended...he STILL wanted all those German
> > > > > people...dead.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't know why he hated German people sooo much.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't live in Germany so I don't know what the problem is...
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > and challenge
> > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 17:45 -0800
  Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 18:52 -0800
    Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 21:24 -0800
      Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2023-01-02 15:27 +0000
        Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-01-05 19:35 -0800
      Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2023-01-02 15:29 +0000
    Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 21:40 -0800
      Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 22:51 -0800
        Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 22:55 -0800
          Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 23:03 -0800
            Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-03 15:08 -0800
              Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-03 15:11 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-03 15:16 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-03 15:20 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-03 15:28 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-03 15:32 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-04 10:19 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-05 00:55 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-05 12:59 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-05 17:36 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-05 17:52 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-05 19:11 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-06 11:32 -0800
        Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein D. Ray <d@ray> - 2023-01-03 07:46 +0000
    Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-02 03:33 -0500
      Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-01-02 01:05 -0800
    Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-01-02 12:22 +0100
      Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein Aether Regaind <AetherRegaind@invalid.com> - 2023-01-02 16:04 +0000

csiph-web