Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #598930

Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein
Date 2023-01-02 22:51 -0800
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <63B3D05E.7B15@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References <63B23747.119C@ix.netcom.com> <b63d7b21-bd36-4138-ab48-8bc92f4e5ddbn@googlegroups.com> <63B26E39.51E1@ix.netcom.com> <383e8c3b-b6bc-444e-a89c-7434faebce75n@googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:40:05 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 10:45:38 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > > In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected."
> > >
> > > The cretin's work is completely unrelated to the A-bomb. Fermi said it, Oppenheimer said it and Serber wrote a book about it.
> >
> > Are you naive?, it was a top-secret operation which means you were not
> > suppose to talk about it
> > to others outside the project. Who would admit to talking to Einstein
> > about all the work being done?
> >
> > Oppenheimer was eventually fired for releasing top-secret info...others
> > got the electric chair.
> > Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly
> > connected.
> > That means he used...liaisons.
> >
> >
> > a buffer. he used buffers.
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
> 
> You have a wicked way of representing that man.
> After WW2 Einstein wanted no association to the bomb.
> He knew if Hitler developed it that would be the most danger
> to the world. He never liked the government decision
> to use it over the Japanese.
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch


"If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein 


I guess in his heart he always wanted to kill Germans.


Even after the ww2 ended...he STILL wanted all those German
people...dead.


I don't know why he hated German people sooo much.

I don't live in Germany so I don't know what the problem is...





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 17:45 -0800
  Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 18:52 -0800
    Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 21:24 -0800
      Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2023-01-02 15:27 +0000
        Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-01-05 19:35 -0800
      Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2023-01-02 15:29 +0000
    Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 21:40 -0800
      Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 22:51 -0800
        Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 22:55 -0800
          Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 23:03 -0800
            Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-03 15:08 -0800
              Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-03 15:11 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-03 15:16 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-03 15:20 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-03 15:28 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-03 15:32 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-04 10:19 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-05 00:55 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-05 12:59 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-05 17:36 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-05 17:52 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-05 19:11 -0800
                Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-06 11:32 -0800
        Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein D. Ray <d@ray> - 2023-01-03 07:46 +0000
    Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-02 03:33 -0500
      Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-01-02 01:05 -0800
    Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-01-02 12:22 +0100
      Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein Aether Regaind <AetherRegaind@invalid.com> - 2023-01-02 16:04 +0000

csiph-web