Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #581271
| Message-ID | <6242BAA5.F29@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-29 00:52 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. |
| References | (2 earlier) <71de9f6d-52ee-4388-b46a-0bd8a8fdc3den@googlegroups.com> <t1scf8$1dn3$1@gioia.aioe.org> <41ef65db-bcca-443c-b30d-d02b998c1d80n@googlegroups.com> <t1shro$6ar$1@gioia.aioe.org> <e3ae04c3-846d-4981-b90a-5af984541768n@googlegroups.com> |
Richard Hertz wrote: > > On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 11:48:27 AM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: > > Richard Hertz <hert...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 10:16:27 AM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > Richard Hertz <hert...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >>> A pet can teach humans what time and time flow is MUCH MORE than any > > >>> human to another. Because they use NATURE, which is embedded into their ADN. > > >>> > > >> This, in the spirit of, “Hey, if science doesn’t reflect what you know > > >> instinctively without any thinking at all, then it’s wrong.†> > >> Way to go for the lowest common denominator, Richard, right where you’re > > >> most comfortable. > > > > > > Bodkin, you have to retrieve your Relativistic ID N° 1378462, printed > > > long time ago. ID N" went to Einstein. > > > > > > As usual, you like to have a wording on anything, IKEA man, with your > > > usual toolkit of sophistry, fallacies and twisting meanings. > > > > > > If you want to adhere to einstenian concept of what time is, buy a wrist > > > or a pocket watch to fit better with that epoch. > > > > > > The problem is that your clock, actually any clock, will show TIME DURATION and not TIME. > > Well, if you think about it, any time coordinate is a duration from a > > selected origin. Really the key of a coordinate reference frame is the > > synchronization of watches distributed in the coordinate system. Any set of > > unsychronized watches will be able to measure a duration for any pair of > > events that occur at the same location. However, to measure either the time > > coordinates of events at different locations, or if you like, the duration > > between the events at different locations, the synchronization is required. > > > > > > Think on it a bit more. As usual, your words reflect more bluster than > > thought. > > > > > > Since relativity is HEAVILY based on the definition of time as described > > > on my OP here, you'll have to admit that the entire relativity > > > theory is A FAIL, because it's based on time duration and yet it's used AS TIME. > > > > > > So go out and get a gifted mathematician to REWRITE the entire theory > > > based on time duration, not time. And this is because such > > > stupid theory (written by an idiot to an audience of more idiotic people) > > > warped the meanings of time (ABSOLUTE) with time duration > > > (RELATIVE). > > > > > > And I don't consider relativity being a science. Not even close. My best > > > calification is to place it in the metaphysics realm, where every > > > possible assertion can be hold, because everything is NON PHYSICAL in such dominion. > > > > > > For the entire building of physics knowledge, void of any trace of > > > relativity, MY DEEPEST RESPECT. > > > > > > But, as I wrote to Dork, if you (Bodkin) have your mind erased with > > > respect ANY TRACE of relativity, your understanding of science > > > collapse entirely and leave you just hollow of scientific knowledge. > > > > > > You invested your adult life adopting and defending relativity, for any > > > given reason: a cult follower or something similar, without THINKING. > > > > > > Pay the price of a life WASTED for nothing, with no visible contribution > > > to society (on the contrary). > > > > > > Stick with woodworking, which poses real physical (and scientific) values. > > > > > > And keep trying to define what time is, in the realm of philosophy, NOT PHYSICS. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > See Bodkin? That's why I call relativity a pile of crap. > Your borrowed knowledge prevented you to think deep all of these years. > > You keep talking about TIME, and I'm talking along this thread about TIME DURATION! > > You feel that you need to synchronize TIME in your einstenian, deceiving clock, which is plain stupid. > > I wrote that TIME DURATION is universal, absolute and independent of any reference except your local surrounding. > > Go back to your desktop and re-write relativity (SR) using TIME DURATION, not TIME. > HINT: You don't have to synchronize anything, except that your TIME MEDIATION DEVICES mark time differences in the same way. > > You and I are in different galaxies of thought. > > You are in a galaxy wannabe, a nebula, and still don't understand what future is waiting for you. > > I'm in a mature galaxy of thought, where I was able to verify that I'm in the right path of thought since I have memory. > > Keep your sand paper and paint at hand, so you can make a living. You suck even as a METAphilosopher, even when it's only one > of your double majors as a BsC. > > You DESERVE to be a relativist. If there is no duration, there is no time. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-27 08:42 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-03-27 16:03 +0000
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2022-03-27 19:06 +0200
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-27 10:22 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-27 10:50 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2022-03-27 12:35 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2022-03-27 22:53 +0200
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-03-28 16:54 +1100
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-27 23:15 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-28 13:16 +0000
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-28 07:19 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-28 14:48 +0000
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-28 08:08 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-28 09:37 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-28 16:56 +0000
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-28 16:49 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-29 01:43 +0000
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-28 21:51 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-28 22:45 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-29 11:26 +0000
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-29 05:03 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-03-29 15:41 -0400
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Callum Wolf <iiw@nkksa.mx> - 2022-03-29 21:08 +0000
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-29 22:28 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-03-30 14:25 -0400
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-30 11:42 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-29 15:59 +0200
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-29 07:05 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-29 18:29 +0200
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-29 10:00 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-29 17:59 +0000
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-29 21:08 +0200
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-03-30 12:47 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-30 22:45 +0200
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-03-30 14:40 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-29 07:32 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. "kellehe...@gmail.com" <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2022-03-29 13:30 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-01 14:22 +0200
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 07:08 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. "kellehe...@gmail.com" <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 12:27 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-01 21:56 +0200
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. "kellehe...@gmail.com" <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 14:40 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-28 23:46 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-29 00:16 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-03-29 20:23 -0400
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-29 18:00 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-03-29 22:09 -0400
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-29 20:28 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-03-30 12:47 -0400
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-30 11:40 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-29 22:32 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-03-29 12:19 +0000
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-29 05:21 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-03-29 13:07 +0000
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-29 07:30 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-29 00:52 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. "kellehe...@gmail.com" <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2022-03-27 11:02 -0700
Cretin Richard Hertz has been reduxced to eating shit and to frothing at the mouth "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-03-27 12:09 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Mikell Coder <mco@nrslnsa.ag> - 2022-03-27 21:15 +0000
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-27 22:43 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-27 23:46 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-28 00:03 -0700
Re: I define Time as what my clock shows, but this is my personal time. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-28 00:07 -0700
csiph-web