Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #576176
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sun, 06 Feb 2022 23:01:39 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <6200A7D5.2558@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Sun, 06 Feb 2022 21:02:13 -0800 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Problem |
| References | <I_HMLUBsBFTOy4Rrxl4zBsLw6uk@jntp> <j6aijtF3fkbU1@mid.individual.net> <I_M3DZ6js13j2xr_EzWA9lB3ehE@jntp> <6200A79A.5728@ix.netcom.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Antivirus | Avast (VPS 220206-16, 02/06/2022), Outbound message |
| X-Antivirus-Status | Clean |
| Lines | 47 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 108.219.229.47 |
| X-Trace | sv3-DcQx9XQ7V2lDEmQkhDrdVlgeZeJ2XYmPrx6roi7/8sfjgS6jsjenWEDfAeGOUYrTCq4nuNgv3STLp9W!dpPt1VV4FHjLVDdklfYMalBcx3vd3qc5uSlOUq6xPb6kXlMMGFhX/MCOFCDHC676X3LzCpHPKdcc!epMLDV7wDZE= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 2605 |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:576176 |
Show key headers only | View raw
i mean no forrest for a tree to fall... The Starmaker wrote: > > For some reason Google Groups doesn't see your post... > no tree fell in the forrest. > > Richard Hachel wrote: > > > > Problem of the day Baccalaureate Seine-Saint-Denis June 2022 (France): > > > > A tap leaks three drops of water every 24 hours, or one drop every eight > > hours. > > > > First question: is this normal? > > > > Second question: Assuming that a day corresponds to approximately 24 > > hours, estimate the loss per day. > > (four points) > > > > Third question: assuming that the neighbor upstairs takes drugs, and that > > his daughter is a prostitute, does this have an impact for you on the > > leakage of the tap? > > (one point). > > > > If not, explain why (fifteen points). > > > > We give the following Lorentz transformations: > > x'=(x+vt)/sqrt(1-v²/c²) > > y'=y > > z'=z > > t'=(t-xv/c²)/sqrt(1-v²/c²) > > The accelerations of the tap water leak will be neglected. > > > > R.H. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Invariance of the speed of light Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-02-06 14:47 +0000
Re: Invariance of the speed of light Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-02-06 08:05 -0800
Re: Invariance of the speed of light whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-02-06 12:33 -0600
Problem Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-02-06 18:59 +0000
Re: Problem The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-06 12:22 -0800
Re: Problem Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-02-06 20:35 +0000
Re: Problem FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2022-02-06 16:10 -0500
Re: Problem The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-06 21:01 -0800
Re: Problem The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-06 21:02 -0800
Re: Invariance of the speed of light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-02-06 14:12 -0800
Re: Invariance of the speed of light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-02-06 16:35 -0800
Re: Invariance of the speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-02-07 06:23 +0100
Re: Invariance of the speed of light Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-02-07 15:14 +0000
Re: Invariance of the speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-02-13 19:14 +0100
Re: Invariance of the speed of light Darrel Angus <argus@iiehdc.mx> - 2022-02-14 07:11 +0000
Re: Invariance of the speed of light Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-02-13 23:54 -0800
Re: Invariance of the speed of light Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-02-14 21:51 +1100
csiph-web