Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #576176

Re: Problem

Message-ID <6200A7D5.2558@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date 2022-02-06 21:02 -0800
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Problem
References <I_HMLUBsBFTOy4Rrxl4zBsLw6uk@jntp> <j6aijtF3fkbU1@mid.individual.net> <I_M3DZ6js13j2xr_EzWA9lB3ehE@jntp> <6200A79A.5728@ix.netcom.com>

Show all headers | View raw


i mean no forrest for a tree to fall...

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> For some reason Google Groups doesn't see your post...
> no tree fell in the forrest.
> 
> Richard Hachel wrote:
> >
> > Problem of the day Baccalaureate Seine-Saint-Denis June 2022 (France):
> >
> > A tap leaks three drops of water every 24 hours, or one drop every eight
> > hours.
> >
> > First question: is this normal?
> >
> > Second question: Assuming that a day corresponds to approximately 24
> > hours, estimate the loss per day.
> > (four points)
> >
> > Third question: assuming that the neighbor upstairs takes drugs, and that
> > his daughter is a prostitute, does this have an impact for you on the
> > leakage of the tap?
> > (one point).
> >
> > If not, explain why (fifteen points).
> >
> > We give the following Lorentz transformations:
> > x'=(x+vt)/sqrt(1-v²/c²)
> > y'=y
> > z'=z
> > t'=(t-xv/c²)/sqrt(1-v²/c²)
> > The accelerations of the tap water leak will be neglected.
> >
> > R.H.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Invariance of the speed of light Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-02-06 14:47 +0000
  Re: Invariance of the speed of light Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-02-06 08:05 -0800
  Re: Invariance of the speed of light whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-02-06 12:33 -0600
    Problem Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-02-06 18:59 +0000
      Re: Problem The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-06 12:22 -0800
        Re: Problem Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-02-06 20:35 +0000
      Re: Problem FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2022-02-06 16:10 -0500
      Re: Problem The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-06 21:01 -0800
        Re: Problem The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-06 21:02 -0800
  Re: Invariance of the speed of light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-02-06 14:12 -0800
    Re: Invariance of the speed of light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-02-06 16:35 -0800
  Re: Invariance of the speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-02-07 06:23 +0100
    Re: Invariance of the speed of light Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-02-07 15:14 +0000
      Re: Invariance of the speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-02-13 19:14 +0100
        Re: Invariance of the speed of light Darrel Angus <argus@iiehdc.mx> - 2022-02-14 07:11 +0000
  Re: Invariance of the speed of light Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-02-13 23:54 -0800
  Re: Invariance of the speed of light Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-02-14 21:51 +1100

csiph-web