Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #625866

Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light?

Show all headers | View raw

On Wednesday, December 13, 2023 at 6:39:17 PM UTC-8, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 13, 2023 at 5:29:02 PM UTC-8, Maciej Wozniak wrote: 
> > On Thursday 14 December 2023 at 02:19:34 UTC+1, Tom Roberts wrote: 
> > > On 12/11/23 3:55 PM, Mike Fontenot wrote: 
> > > > On 12/11/23 10:49 AM, Tom Roberts wrote: 
> > > >> [...] 
> > > > 
> > > > All of your misguided conclusions about inertial reference frames in 
> > > > special relativity stem from a single mistake: you've apparently 
> > > > never really understood what Einstein showed us about inertial 
> > > > reference frames. 
> > > Nonsense. My conclusions are not "misguided", and I understand fully 
> > > what Einstein showed. 
> > Oh, the mumble of your idiot guru was not 
> > even consisted, it was demonstrated here 
> > many times. Of course, you've understood 
> > correctly the most important thing: THE 
> > BEST WAY we're FORCED to.
> You'll find a hard time beating Einstein's approximations, 
> which beat Newton's approximations, 
> which sort of edged out Kepler's approximations. 
> 
> That said, the centralizing and uniformizing tendencies, 
> and propensities, of restitution and oscillation, 
> and attenuation and dissipation, find that for many 
> models Kepler has a lot going on, ditto Newton. 
> 
> That kinetics and kinematics or linear and rotational, 
> mechanics, make for the according to Einstein's only 
> last theory as from "Out of My Later Years", that 
> Einstein's bridges are about the differences between 
> linear and rotational, that aren't ascribed in his earlier. 
> 
> Similarly momentum is let out, it's "inertial systems", 
> about the moments and about the rods or measures, 
> in their metrics, which quite fully define the forces, 
> as quite totally about relative (comparative) masses, 
> and meeting and parting for acceleration and deceleration 
> variously. 
> 
> So, in a theory where it's the potential fields their forces 
> that are real, and the shadow or umbra or well is what's 
> real instead of the classical ray the linear impulse, there's 
> a lot going on why there is a _deconstructivist account_, 
> because "it's an open system", that energy's form matters 
> besides its equivalence in terms, about the regimes of the 
> corners of the sliding scales as about the running constants. 
> 
> Electrical current or the propagation of electron holes in 
> usual conductors isn't perfect, or as with respect to it 
> being orders of magnitude less than c. 
> 
> That standing waves propagate radio waves about at c, 
> speak a lot to that those are in fields standing at such time. 
> 
> The Brehmsstrahlung or braking radiation, helps to illustrate 
> for the Cerenkov that light after the radionuclear is, "tachyonic". 
> 
> That linear and rotational are different with respect to mass/energy 
> equivalency is in the terms of kinetic energy, then with respect to 
> models of gravity and, "asymptotic freedom", really reflect why 
> something like Jefimenko has a sort of explanation. 
> 
> The Allais effect is sort of profound and every few years it's 
> demonstrated either way. 
> 
> For having charge and plain K.E. as about the electrmagnetic 
> and electromotive, and also about bonds and the chemical of 
> course, in the organization of molecular matter, and, about 
> the radionuclear and the optical or light like about atomic matter, 
> helps to break it down why there can be a unified field theory, 
> given that usually the lifetime of isotopes and after that netrons 
> is long. thus last, while light's fastest fleeting, or flux, with the 
> kinetic and electromotive in the middle, and electromagnetic 
> radiation at the edge of that. 
> 
> So, Einstein left it in his greatest, and minimally attached, theory 
> from out of "Out of My Later Years", a well-reknowned grandiose hedge. 
> 
> 
> (The BEST way.)




The today's theories mostly don't have a theory of gravity and also 
don't much include a reason why the light-like and the nuclear, 
are related.

So, being that it's a continuum mechanics (this is also the point of 
saying that it's a gauge theory, that there is a gauge of a field theory), 
makes for quite a deterministic theory and about the causes of things, 
or "the mechanism:  a model abstractly to equip models for theories", 
while encompassing the great variation of things, explaining the 
effects, of sampling, measurement, and observation, and with respect, 
to why our stochastics are statistical, our statistical is scientific, and 
our scientific is of a theory of a physical model, a mathematical model, 
that is a theory.

That is "A Theory", ....

Theoretical physicists know theoretical physics needs these things.








> Do they see each other coming?

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-09 14:14 -0700
  Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-10 09:48 -0700
    Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-10 11:39 -0700
      Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-10 15:00 -0700
        Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Cresencio Nurmuhametov Pasternak <arth@mecucnec.rn> - 2023-12-10 23:29 +0000
          Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-10 18:53 -0600
        Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-11 10:32 -0700
  Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-11 11:49 -0600
    Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-11 14:55 -0700
      Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-13 19:19 -0600
        Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-13 17:28 -0800
          Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-12-13 18:39 -0800
            Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-12-15 13:06 -0800
        Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-14 12:47 -0700
          Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-14 13:55 -0600
            Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-14 13:32 -0700
              Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-12-14 18:31 -0800
            Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-14 15:27 -0700
              Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-17 16:18 -0700
                Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-12-17 19:25 -0800
                Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-18 09:29 -0700
                Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-18 12:16 -0600
                Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-18 13:28 -0700
                Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-18 21:04 -0600
                Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-12-18 20:36 -0800
                Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-19 09:09 -0700
                Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-12-23 12:21 +0200
                Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-12-23 11:28 -0800
        Re: Does the Principle of Relativity travel at the speed of light? hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2023-12-21 22:34 +0000

csiph-web