Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.math |
| Subject | Re: The Apollo moon landings |
| Date | Sun, 15 Jun 2025 10:02:19 +0200 |
| Lines | 42 |
| Message-ID | <mb7cs3Fphl9U5@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <a16b2511c2fa4b644b5a5e19b1a6eb3c@www.novabbs.org> <e0sehl-9nif.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <7dc7938d9b3ffb3a32296f91500919f5@www.novabbs.org> <qoefhl-n19g.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <3a795d50693d32803192afbfa0ba3d91@www.novabbs.org> <7eighl-5rrh.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <1024bfi$3tu9k$1@dont-email.me> <2b491008a5fda623023d747ba70ffb7f@www.novabbs.com> <6434ec1576769c686742c4ed2fe52a48@www.novabbs.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net MDE80H4lnjdkg8wluKCQFAuEnN7fMzPpmtFNopGzssnPWm/RQg |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:BxX3dpmdlnwOCamDXw7PIkbaS8E= sha256:6vJsA5HA9qoOBe6PY5NQbk34HDb7mU6y2C6UT5AhPxE= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla Thunderbird |
| Content-Language | de-DE, en-US |
| In-Reply-To | <6434ec1576769c686742c4ed2fe52a48@www.novabbs.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:664216 sci.math:638719 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 06:17 schrieb LaurenceClarkCrossen: > On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 0:11:55 +0000, rhertz wrote: > >> Explain the infamous conference of Neil Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins, >> where they looked like dead inside. They didn't even smile once, and the >> guilt and shame was all over them. Why did this happen for more than 2 >> hours, >> >> By far, not the happiest men in the world, having conquered the Moon, >> isn't it? >> >> >> >> >> Apollo 11 Post Flight Press Conference (1969) >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvg5UBdiIHs > The usual "skeptic" is someone who defends the consensus of > professionals by means of an either-or dichotomy between "science" and > "pseudoscience" relying on appeal to "authority" while ridiculing > critics. It's lucky the moon landings succeeded if they tried to rely on > relativity! The 'usual skeptic' would look at the 'body language' of these heros. They didn't look very pleased, for instance, while being honored by standing ovations. Those were, apparently, 'orchestrated' by these guys sitting in the middle of the audience. But some sort of positive emotions would be a natural reaction to that kind of applause. But that didn't happen. Instead of smiling and grinning, the astronauts bowed their heads down, what is not the usual sign for good feelings. TH
Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: The Apollo moon landings Powell Speech-language pathologists Ban <con@gpwzos.org> - 2025-06-08 15:50 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-06-09 00:11 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-09 07:31 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 01:18 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-06-14 04:17 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-15 10:02 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-07-05 10:25 +0000
csiph-web