Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| From | Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.logic |
| Subject | Re: Some results about unit fractions |
| Date | 2023-07-01 12:58 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <159ca492-d7e1-d4d3-f0d8-44ccbde3946b@att.net> (permalink) |
| References | (16 earlier) <5bf3786a-17a4-403b-94f8-de8343ecd263n@googlegroups.com> <91d90c26-9cd8-fdfe-9989-b52239d1aef1@att.net> <2e770bb4-eff9-4339-9b41-f31971887203n@googlegroups.com> <86da3652-697e-ed01-b1b5-8d302884173f@att.net> <db42a6a8-9ffb-4a82-8d06-ef4211bd5487n@googlegroups.com> |
On 6/30/2023 2:49 PM, WM wrote: > Jim Burns schrieb am Freitag, > 30. Juni 2023 um 20:14:30 UTC+2: >> On 6/30/2023 1:27 PM, WM wrote: >>> Two consecutive actually infinite sets >>> in ℕ are impossible. >>> Increase from 0 to ℵo requires >>> finite intermediate steps 1, 2, 3, ... . >>> Bob does not disappear. for each cell p/q p/q↔n/1 swaps X into p/q and, if i/j↔k/1 is after p/q↔n/1 then X remains in p/q for each cell p/q if Bob Not-An-X is in p/q then it is not after p/q↔n/1 so it is not after all swaps if it is after all swaps then, for each cell p/q Bob Not-An-X is not in p/q 'Bye, Bob. >> Quia ego sic dico > > No, because otherwise > mathematics and even set theory > would lack their logical foundations. These foundations remain: A descriptive claim is true of each thing it describes, even if it is one of infinitely-many, even if we don't name it, even if it is darkᵂᴹ Some claims are in a sequence in which they are _visibly_ not first false. They can be false, but only if some claim preceding it in the sequence is false, so not first. For example, in ⟨ ... P∨Q ... ¬Q ... Q ... ⟩ Q is _visibly_ not first false. Some finite sequences of claims are _only_ descriptions of what we're describing (which must be true) and claims visibly not first false (which must be true) Each claim in such a sequence must be true of each thing described, even if it is one of infinitely-many, even if we don't name it, even if it is darkᵂᴹ >> Quia ego sic dico > > No, because otherwise > mathematics and even set theory > would lack their logical foundations. One would lose "Quia ego sic dico" but, otherwise, the foundations are fine. One might, by way of compensating for the loss, learn how to reason by augmenting descriptions with not-first-false claims. If one did that, one would learn that, sometimes, Bob disappears.
Back to sci.logic | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Some results about unit fractions Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-20 01:34 +0100
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-20 08:34 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-20 10:09 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-20 10:18 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-21 07:17 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-06-21 16:52 +0200
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-22 05:48 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-22 13:20 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-22 00:51 +0100
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-22 05:58 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-23 01:05 +0100
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-22 17:17 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-23 02:26 +0100
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 09:01 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-26 01:59 +0100
Re: Some results about unit fractions JVR <jrennenkampff@googlemail.com> - 2023-06-26 04:42 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-26 14:42 +0100
Re: Some results about unit fractions JVR <jrennenkampff@googlemail.com> - 2023-06-26 15:22 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-06-27 01:14 +0200
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 08:12 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 07:59 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 08:53 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 09:52 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-26 02:05 +0100
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 08:05 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-29 01:34 +0100
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 05:31 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 16:37 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 10:18 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 10:21 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-06-30 13:52 -0400
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 19:15 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-30 14:27 +0100
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 10:03 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 10:06 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 10:09 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 10:15 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 10:21 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 10:26 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-07-02 02:05 +0100
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 09:04 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 09:56 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-30 16:47 +0100
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 10:15 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 10:20 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-07-02 02:13 +0100
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 08:59 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 09:34 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 09:55 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-07-02 19:10 +0200
Re: Some results about unit fractions Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-06-30 13:01 -0400
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 10:27 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-06-30 14:14 -0400
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 11:49 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-06-30 20:30 -0400
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 10:26 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-07-01 16:18 -0400
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 17:37 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-07-01 12:55 -0400
Re: Some results about unit fractions Transfinity <transfinity01@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 10:32 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-07-01 15:42 -0400
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 08:17 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 13:00 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-07-01 16:24 -0400
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 14:05 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 14:28 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-07-01 17:30 -0400
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 14:44 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-07-01 18:49 -0400
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 17:07 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-07-02 06:20 -0400
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 04:04 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 08:39 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 08:33 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 08:27 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-07-02 01:50 +0100
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 08:50 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 08:19 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-07-01 12:58 -0400
Re: Some results about unit fractions Transfinity <transfinity01@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 11:16 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-07-01 15:16 -0400
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 08:14 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-07-02 18:44 -0400
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 06:31 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-07-03 11:32 -0400
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-07-04 11:46 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-07-04 19:12 -0400
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-04 16:25 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-07-04 22:14 -0400
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 18:13 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-07-06 12:45 -0400
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 09:50 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-07-04 11:51 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-04 13:35 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 10:07 -0700
Re: Some results about unit fractions WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-07-04 11:53 -0700
csiph-web