Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #482048
| From | John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: OT: The Slut is Back |
| Date | 2017-10-18 17:12 -0700 |
| Organization | highland technology |
| Message-ID | <77rfuc93nc4uom7g028gcvio03prtoj3kl@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <6gdduc93qig35lbvfjrcj3r1clfjvpsoig@4ax.com> <xKyFB.37418$K_2.16813@fx07.iad> <3r4fuctam8vdu6dojcsvrud7skqohf05vu@4ax.com> <os870q$so8$1@dont-email.me> <cGQFB.17553$4A2.12369@fx40.iad> |
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 18:34:48 -0400, bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> wrote: >On 10/18/2017 02:03 PM, Tom Del Rosso wrote: > >>>> Hollywood makes a lot of movies with stealth bombers in them too, >>>> but I bet a lot of directors would be opposed to legislation funding >>>> construction of 150 more B-2s. What's the deal with that? >>> >>> I wonder what is the average number of gunshots (or raygun shots) in >>> Hollywood movies. It's got to be hundreds. Maybe half of movie ads >>> show the lead characters holding guns. >> >> The whole idea of Charlie's Angels was that they didn't use guns. Then >> they made a movie version and in the poster ad they were pictured using >> a flame thrower. >> >> I think this shows a lack of comprehension of the nature of weapons in >> general on the part of Hollywood types. > >They're in the business of selling a product to Americans for the most >part, maybe they just know what their audience likes? Sure. Like heroin dealers, cigarette sellers, video game makers, porn mongers, casinos, and crunchy cheetos sellers. All artificially hyper-exploiting basic human appetites. The crunchy cheetos are actually good. The puffy ones aren't. -- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc picosecond timing precision measurement jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
OT: The Slut is Back Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-10-17 16:56 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2017-10-17 17:14 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back krw@notreal.com - 2017-10-17 21:01 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-10-17 19:04 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-10-17 22:10 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-10-17 22:26 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2017-10-18 10:49 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back "Tom Del Rosso" <fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> - 2017-10-18 14:03 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-10-18 18:34 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2017-10-18 17:12 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-10-18 20:33 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2017-10-20 10:10 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back Jan Panteltje <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-10-20 17:42 +0000
Re: OT: The Slut is Back M Philbrook <jamie_ka1lpa@charter.net> - 2017-10-19 21:06 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-10-19 21:05 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back "Tom Del Rosso" <fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> - 2017-10-18 10:59 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-10-18 12:53 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back "Tom Del Rosso" <fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> - 2017-10-18 13:24 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-10-18 13:51 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back "Tom Del Rosso" <fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> - 2017-10-18 14:27 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-10-18 16:57 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-10-18 17:57 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-10-18 18:13 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-10-18 18:27 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back "Tom Del Rosso" <fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> - 2017-10-19 01:29 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-10-18 23:22 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-10-19 08:31 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-10-19 08:35 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-10-19 07:28 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back "Tom Del Rosso" <fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> - 2017-10-20 13:00 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-10-19 21:10 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back "Tom Del Rosso" <fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> - 2017-10-19 01:14 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-10-19 08:51 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com - 2017-10-19 07:45 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back Jan Panteltje <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-10-19 15:03 +0000
Re: OT: The Slut is Back dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com - 2017-10-20 05:26 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back Jan Panteltje <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-10-20 13:26 +0000
Re: OT: The Slut is Back dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com - 2017-10-22 02:35 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back Jan Panteltje <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-10-22 11:09 +0000
Re: OT: The Slut is Back dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com - 2017-10-22 09:51 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back Jan Panteltje <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-10-22 17:48 +0000
Re: OT: The Slut is Back dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com - 2017-10-23 23:27 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-10-24 00:14 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back Jan Panteltje <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-10-24 09:39 +0000
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-10-22 17:59 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back krw@notreal.com - 2017-10-22 19:35 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-10-23 09:38 +0000
Re: OT: The Slut is Back krw@notreal.com - 2017-10-23 20:13 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-10-23 18:53 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back Jan Panteltje <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-10-24 09:41 +0000
Re: OT: The Slut is Back krw@notreal.com - 2017-10-24 20:25 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-10-24 18:23 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back Michael A Terrell <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2017-10-24 22:16 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back krw@notreal.com - 2017-10-24 22:40 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-10-24 20:32 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back Jan Panteltje <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-10-25 12:01 +0000
Re: OT: The Slut is Back krw@notreal.com - 2017-10-25 20:23 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-10-22 08:22 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-10-21 01:03 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-10-21 00:38 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-10-19 09:01 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-10-18 16:26 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-10-17 18:12 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-10-17 21:54 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-10-17 19:10 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-10-17 22:13 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-10-18 08:47 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-10-18 16:29 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back M Philbrook <jamie_ka1lpa@charter.net> - 2017-10-19 20:58 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-10-21 01:05 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-10-17 22:41 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-10-17 19:53 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back krw@notreal.com - 2017-10-17 22:17 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-10-17 22:40 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com - 2017-10-18 17:46 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-10-18 19:30 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back krw@notreal.com - 2017-10-18 21:26 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-10-17 20:00 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back Jan Panteltje <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-10-18 07:12 +0000
Re: OT: The Slut is Back John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-10-18 09:13 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-10-18 13:03 -0400
Re: OT: The Slut is Back Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-10-18 18:12 +0100
Re: OT: The Slut is Back John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2017-10-18 10:34 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-10-18 17:40 +0000
Re: OT: The Slut is Back John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2017-10-18 12:25 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-10-18 16:38 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back Jan Panteltje <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-10-18 17:19 +0000
Re: OT: The Slut is Back bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-10-18 16:32 -0700
Re: OT: The Slut is Back Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-10-21 12:25 +0000
csiph-web