Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #490167
| From | Don Kuenz <g@crcomp.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: AC switch fault current philosophy |
| Date | 2018-01-03 17:57 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20180103a@crcomp.net> (permalink) |
| References | <p22o2k$svd$1@dont-email.me> <20171228b@crcomp.net> <p23jf7$asc$1@dont-email.me> |
Tim Williams <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> wrote: > "Don Kuenz" <g@crcomp.net> wrote in message news:20171228b@crcomp.net... >> You might limit the current and trip the mains breaker to cope with the >> short. That way you simultaneously protect the shorted device and send >> users a dramatic message that something's wrong. > > How does that work? > > If you have a shunt coil to trip the breaker separately (like a lot of > UL1077 breakers do, or the guts of a GFCI receptacle), you can open the > circuit without drawing fault current. Though that still won't act fast > enough to save a transistor (not without a switching mechanism like I > described, anyway). Is it possible to separate the current limit functionality from the mains breaker trip? Limit the current first and always, sense an over current state, and then leisurely use a low voltage to trip the mains breaker a few cycles later? Thank you, -- Don Kuenz, KB7RPU
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Re: AC switch fault current philosophy Don Kuenz <g@crcomp.net> - 2018-01-03 17:57 +0000
Re: AC switch fault current philosophy "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2018-01-03 14:29 -0600
Re: AC switch fault current philosophy Don Kuenz <g@crcomp.net> - 2018-01-03 20:54 +0000
Re: AC switch fault current philosophy "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2018-01-03 15:05 -0600
Re: AC switch fault current philosophy Don Kuenz <g@crcomp.net> - 2018-01-03 22:07 +0000
csiph-web