Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > linux.debian.security

linux.debian.security

2199 articles, 725 threads (numbers 4277 – 6504) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
Questions re: modprobe mitigations and auditing (from: CVE-2026-31431) James Addison <jay@jp-hosting.net> 2026-05-13 13:10 +0200
 
[nghttp2] request for review of Debian CVE-2023-44487 backports Lukas Märdian <slyon@debian.org> 2026-04-29 16:40 +0200
 
Re: DSA Urgency Critical Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> 2026-04-26 21:20 +0200
 
harbian-audit v0.8.0 for Debian 13 is released Samson <sccxboy@gmail.com> 2026-04-11 18:20 +0200
 
Re: Upcoming stable point release (13.4) "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> 2026-03-14 12:50 +0100
 
Request for Sponsorship Toward Debian Maintainer Status — Security Team Focus Meso Security <MesoSecurity@protonmail.ch> 2026-02-04 00:20 +0100
 
Re: Next Event- Sponsor, Exhibitor & Delegates Acquisition Strategy! Caralin wilson <caralin@p2bservices.com> 2026-02-03 10:20 +0100
 
Re: Upcoming oldstable point release (12.13) Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org> 2026-01-10 13:50 +0100
 
Re: Upcoming stable point release (13.3) Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org> 2026-01-10 13:50 +0100
 
経営者の8割が誤解する「教育市場」 石島 紗希/教育フランチャイズセミナー事務局 <info@fc-seminar-online.jp> 2025-12-17 07:40 +0100
 
Re: Errands task manager upstream unconditionally disables TLS certificate verification for CalDAV; does this need to be addressed? Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> 2025-12-10 08:20 +0100
 
Keyserver for gpg.conf ? (13 replies) Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org> 2025-11-15 10:40 +0100
   → Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> 2025-11-15 19:10 +0100
     → Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> 2025-11-15 21:50 +0100
       → Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? debianmailinglists.hz5zm@simplelogin.com 2025-11-16 04:10 +0100
         → Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> 2025-11-16 17:10 +0100
         → Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> 2025-11-17 16:30 +0100
           → Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> 2025-11-17 16:40 +0100
       → Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> 2025-11-16 17:10 +0100
     → Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org> 2025-11-16 13:40 +0100
       → Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> 2025-11-16 17:10 +0100
   → Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> 2025-11-17 17:00 +0100
     → Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org> 2025-11-17 18:40 +0100
       → Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> 2025-11-17 18:50 +0100
       → Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? debianmailinglists.hz5zm@simplelogin.com 2025-11-18 01:50 +0100
 
Re: Upcoming stable point release (13.2) "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> 2025-11-15 12:00 +0100
 
Fips Module Config (1 reply) Robert A Wooldridge <bob.wooldridge@edm-inc.com> 2025-10-28 22:50 +0100
   → Re: Fips Module Config bhaskarvilles@duck.com 2025-10-29 08:00 +0100
 
Status of Intel CET in Debian (2 replies) Stephan Verbücheln <verbuecheln@posteo.de> 2025-10-15 09:40 +0200
   → Re: Status of Intel CET in Debian Stephan Verbücheln <verbuecheln@posteo.de> 2025-10-15 15:50 +0200
   → Re: Status of Intel CET in Debian Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org> 2025-10-16 09:40 +0200
 
Re: Re: BerkeleyDB CVEs Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> 2025-10-15 15:50 +0200
 
Re: ftp.debian.org: remove armel from forky and unstable (5 replies) Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org> 2025-09-25 23:50 +0200
   → Re: ftp.debian.org: remove armel from forky and unstable Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org> 2025-09-27 17:20 +0200
   → Re: ftp.debian.org: remove armel from forky and unstable Sylvain Beucler <beuc@beuc.net> 2025-09-26 16:50 +0200
     → Re: ftp.debian.org: remove armel from forky and unstable Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org> 2025-09-27 01:20 +0200
       → Re: ftp.debian.org: remove armel from forky and unstable Sylvain Beucler <beuc@beuc.net> 2025-09-27 13:10 +0200
     → Re: ftp.debian.org: remove armel from forky and unstable Jochen Sprickerhof <jspricke@debian.org> 2025-09-26 18:50 +0200
 
Re: BerkeleyDB CVEs Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> 2025-09-26 17:30 +0200
 
On the status of rust/go packages (1 reply) Sly <slycelot@yandex.ru> 2025-09-27 04:50 +0200
   → Re: On the status of rust/go packages Fabian Grünbichler <debian@fabian.gruenbichler.email> 2025-09-27 10:20 +0200
 
Re: BerkeleyDB CVEs (1 reply) Carlos Henrique Lima Melara <charles@debian.org> 2025-09-26 17:40 +0200
   → Re: BerkeleyDB CVEs Sylvain Beucler <beuc@beuc.net> 2025-09-26 18:00 +0200
 
Re: BerkeleyDB CVEs debianmailinglists.hz5zm@simplelogin.com 2025-09-26 15:50 +0200
 
Re: Upcoming (old)stable point releases: 13.1 and 12.12 "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> 2025-09-06 13:20 +0200
 
Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5973-1] linux security update (3 replies) Stephan Seitz <stse+debian@rootsland.net> 2025-08-14 11:10 +0200
   → Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5973-1] linux security update Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> 2025-08-16 20:50 +0200
     → Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5973-1] linux security update Stephan Seitz <stse+debian@rootsland.net> 2025-08-18 20:20 +0200
       → Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5973-1] linux security update Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> 2025-08-19 05:50 +0200
 
Why Does Debian Use PGP to Sign Packages (4 replies) fosres@posteo.de 2025-08-16 03:40 +0200
   → Re: Why Does Debian Use PGP to Sign Packages Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> 2025-08-16 11:20 +0200
     → Re: Why Does Debian Use PGP to Sign Packages Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> 2025-08-16 11:40 +0200
   → Re: Why Does Debian Use PGP to Sign Packages Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> 2025-08-16 11:30 +0200
   → Re: Why Does Debian Use PGP to Sign Packages kpcyrd <kpcyrd@archlinux.org> 2025-08-16 16:30 +0200
 
Why Do Developers Continue to Sign with GNUPG (5 replies) fosres@posteo.de 2025-08-10 17:00 +0200
   → Re: Why Do Developers Continue to Sign with GNUPG "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> 2025-08-10 17:50 +0200
   → Re: Why Do Developers Continue to Sign with GNUPG Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> 2025-08-10 20:30 +0200
     → Re: Why Do Developers Continue to Sign with GNUPG Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> 2025-08-12 00:10 +0200
   → Re: Why Do Developers Continue to Sign with GNUPG Malte <ml@enteig.net> 2025-08-10 20:40 +0200
   → Re: Why Do Developers Continue to Sign with GNUPG Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> 2025-08-11 07:00 +0200
 
should the Release Notes be updated concerning trixie security (2 replies) Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> 2025-07-12 22:10 +0200
   → Re: should the Release Notes be updated concerning trixie security Santiago Ruano Rincón <santiagorr@riseup.net> 2025-07-13 01:20 +0200
     → Re: should the Release Notes be updated concerning trixie security Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> 2025-07-13 10:30 +0200
 
Security tracker suggestions (1 reply) Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> 2025-06-26 02:20 +0200
   → Re: Security tracker suggestions Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> 2025-06-27 23:50 +0200
 
Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual (14 replies) Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org> 2025-06-09 18:30 +0200
   → Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Michael Lazin <microlaser@gmail.com> 2025-06-09 18:40 +0200
   → Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> 2025-06-09 18:50 +0200
     → Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> 2025-06-11 12:10 +0200
       → Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> 2025-06-11 18:50 +0200
   → Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Jeffrey Chimene <jeff@systasis.co> 2025-06-09 19:10 +0200
   → Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Rob Ward <pocketapocketa@protonmail.com> 2025-06-09 19:20 +0200
   → Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Vladislav Kurz <vladislav.kurz@webstep.net> 2025-06-09 22:10 +0200
   → Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual "Dave P." <dprowseus@gmail.com> 2025-06-10 15:20 +0200
     → Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Javier Fernandez-Sanguino <jfs@debian.org> 2025-06-10 22:10 +0200
       → Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org> 2025-06-10 23:00 +0200
         → Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Javier Fernandez-Sanguino <jfs@debian.org> 2025-06-11 00:00 +0200
           → Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual debianmailinglists.hz5zm@simplelogin.com 2025-06-11 08:30 +0200
           → Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual "Dave P." <dprowseus@gmail.com> 2025-06-11 16:50 +0200
   → Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual debianmailinglists.hz5zm@simplelogin.com 2025-06-10 19:50 +0200
 
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) (10 replies) Samuel Henrique <samueloph@debian.org> 2024-11-28 00:50 +0100
   → Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> 2024-12-01 15:10 +0100
     → Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique <samueloph@debian.org> 2025-03-02 21:50 +0100
       → Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique <samueloph@debian.org> 2025-04-13 17:30 +0200
         → Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> 2025-04-13 17:40 +0200
       → Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique <samueloph@debian.org> 2025-04-13 18:10 +0200
         → Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> 2025-05-01 11:30 +0200
           → Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique <samueloph@debian.org> 2025-05-10 21:40 +0200
             → Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Santiago Ruano Rincón <santiagorr@riseup.net> 2025-05-16 20:30 +0200
               → Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> 2025-05-18 18:50 +0200
                 → Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> 2025-06-03 23:30 +0200
 
DebCamp 25 Security Tracker sprint - planning announcement Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> 2025-05-22 15:30 +0200
 
Re: Clarification Request: Acceptable Scenarios for Submitting CVE Fixes to Debian Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> 2025-05-17 22:20 +0200
 
Re: Upcoming stable point release: 12.11 Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org> 2025-05-17 11:30 +0200
 
eiärkmýčaež moullereau.rosalina@gmail.com 2025-05-15 07:10 +0200
 
SHH Cipher recommendations and "prohibitions" from Debian? (3 replies) c.buhtz@posteo.jp 2025-05-13 11:40 +0200
   → Re: SHH Cipher recommendations and "prohibitions" from Debian? Bartosz Fenski <bartosz@fenski.pl> 2025-05-13 12:50 +0200
   → Re: SHH Cipher recommendations and "prohibitions" from Debian? c.buhtz@posteo.jp 2025-05-13 13:20 +0200
   → Use ~/.ssh/config Stephan Verbücheln <verbuecheln@posteo.de> 2025-05-13 14:20 +0200
 
Open security issues affecting trixie which are not RC (2025-04-29) (3 replies) Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> 2025-04-29 20:30 +0200
   → Re: Open security issues affecting trixie which are not RC (2025-04-29) Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> 2025-04-29 22:20 +0200
     → Re: Open security issues affecting trixie which are not RC (2025-04-29) NoisyCoil <noisycoil@disroot.org> 2025-04-29 23:40 +0200
   → Re: Open security issues affecting trixie which are not RC (2025-04-29) Sune Vuorela <nospam@vuorela.dk> 2025-04-30 09:10 +0200
 
Testmail (12 replies) hste@tutamail.com 2025-03-22 10:10 +0100
   → Re: Testmail sylvain <contact@baal.fr> 2025-03-22 11:20 +0100
   → Testmail Arne Pisch <old_man999@freenet.de> 2025-03-22 12:30 +0100
     → Re: Testmail j V <janoval42@gmail.com> 2025-03-22 15:40 +0100
     → Re: Testmail Álesson Nunes <pinkblez@gmail.com> 2025-03-22 19:40 +0100
   → Re: Testmail Meso Security <MesoSecurity@protonmail.ch> 2025-03-22 18:50 +0100
   → Re: Testmail Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> 2025-03-22 18:50 +0100
   → FWD: Re: Testmail hste@tutamail.com 2025-03-23 08:40 +0100
     → Strange welcome after a testmail hste@tutamail.com 2025-03-24 10:30 +0100
       → Re: Strange welcome after a testmail Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> 2025-03-24 16:40 +0100
       → FWD: FWD: FWD: Re: Strange welcome after a testmail hste@tutamail.com 2025-03-24 17:10 +0100
         → Re: FWD: FWD: FWD: Re: Strange welcome after a testmail Lupe Christoph <lupe@lupe-christoph.de> 2025-03-24 17:20 +0100
       → FWD: Re: Strange welcome after a testmail hste@tutamail.com 2025-03-24 19:50 +0100
 
Re: sbuscribe Povl Ole Haarlev Olsen <debian-security@stderr.dk> 2025-03-19 14:50 +0100
 
PHISHING ALERT: Re: Email delivery failed Julien Plissonneau Duquène <sre4ever@free.fr> 2025-01-27 08:50 +0100
 
Intel Microcode updates (30 replies) Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> 2019-06-10 06:10 +0200
   → Re: Intel Microcode updates Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> 2019-06-10 13:20 +0200
     → Re: Intel Microcode updates Davide Prina <davide.prina@gmail.com> 2019-06-10 19:50 +0200
       → Re: Intel Microcode updates Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> 2019-06-10 20:40 +0200
         → Re: Intel Microcode updates Davide Prina <davide.prina@gmail.com> 2019-06-11 20:10 +0200
           → Re: Intel Microcode updates Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> 2019-06-11 22:00 +0200
     → Re: Intel Microcode updates Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> 2019-06-11 14:00 +0200
   → Re: Intel Microcode updates Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> 2019-06-11 04:20 +0200
     → Re: Intel Microcode updates Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> 2019-06-11 14:00 +0200
       → Re: Intel Microcode updates Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> 2019-06-11 14:30 +0200
         → Re: Intel Microcode updates Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> 2019-06-12 17:00 +0200
           → Re: Intel Microcode updates Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@gmail.com> 2019-06-18 13:00 +0200
             → Re: Intel Microcode updates Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> 2019-06-23 22:30 +0200
               → Re: Intel Microcode updates Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@gmail.com> 2019-06-23 22:40 +0200
                 → Re: Intel Microcode updates Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> 2019-06-24 04:10 +0200
               → Re: Intel Microcode updates Davide Prina <davide.prina@gmail.com> 2019-06-24 19:40 +0200
             → Re: Intel Microcode updates "Henrique de Moraes Holschuh" <hmh@debian.org> 2024-12-08 01:20 +0100
           → Re: Intel Microcode updates Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@gmail.com> 2019-06-18 22:10 +0200
           → Re: Intel Microcode updates Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@gmail.com> 2019-06-22 14:30 +0200
     → Re: Intel Microcode updates Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> 2019-06-11 19:10 +0200
       → Re: Intel Microcode updates Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> 2019-06-11 19:20 +0200
         → Re: Intel Microcode updates Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> 2019-06-11 21:10 +0200
           → Re: Intel Microcode updates Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> 2019-06-11 21:20 +0200
             → Re: Intel Microcode updates Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@gmail.com> 2019-06-18 11:20 +0200
               → Re: Intel Microcode updates Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> 2019-06-18 20:30 +0200
                 → Re: Intel Microcode updates Rob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl> 2019-06-20 14:40 +0200
             → Re: Intel Microcode updates Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@gmail.com> 2019-06-18 22:10 +0200
             → Re: Intel Microcode updates Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@gmail.com> 2019-06-22 14:30 +0200
     → Re: Intel Microcode updates Davide Prina <davide.prina@gmail.com> 2019-06-23 10:00 +0200
       → Re: Intel Microcode updates Lou Poppler <LouPoppler@cableone.net> 2019-06-24 02:20 +0200
         → Re: Intel Microcode updates Davide Prina <davide.prina@gmail.com> 2019-06-24 20:00 +0200
 
Re: [DSA 5824-1] chromium security update (1 reply) Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> 2024-12-07 13:10 +0100
   → Re: [DSA 5824-1] chromium security update Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> 2024-12-07 13:30 +0100
 
Should Debian ask for a CPE when a CVE in Debian is found? (8 replies) "Wheeler, David A" <dwheeler@ida.org> 2016-02-12 17:30 +0100
   → RE: Should Debian ask for a CPE when a CVE in Debian is found? "Booth, Harold" <harold.booth@nist.gov> 2016-02-12 19:30 +0100
     → Re: Should Debian ask for a CPE when a CVE in Debian is found? "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@linuxfoundation.org> 2024-12-01 21:50 +0100
   → Re: Should Debian ask for a CPE when a CVE in Debian is found? Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> 2016-02-13 22:00 +0100
     → Re: Should Debian ask for a CPE when a CVE in Debian is found? Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> 2016-02-15 10:10 +0100
       → Re: Should Debian ask for a CPE when a CVE in Debian is found? Vulchev <v.vulchev@gmail.com> 2016-02-15 10:30 +0100
       → Re: Should Debian ask for a CPE when a CVE in Debian is found? Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@gmail.com> 2016-02-15 10:40 +0100
         → Re: Should Debian ask for a CPE when a CVE in Debian is found? "georg@riseup.net" <georg@riseup.net> 2016-02-15 18:40 +0100
       → Re: Should Debian ask for a CPE when a CVE in Debian is found? Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> 2016-02-16 00:50 +0100
 
Re: I forgot my password and Debian need password when booting (6 replies) Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> 2019-10-27 03:30 +0100
   → Re: I forgot my password and Debian need password when booting Mostaf Faridi <mostafafaridi@gmail.com> 2019-10-27 08:00 +0100
     → Re: I forgot my password and Debian need password when booting Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> 2019-10-27 08:30 +0100
   → Re: I forgot my password and Debian need password when booting Craig <chouck@binghamton.edu> 2019-10-27 22:10 +0100
     → Re: I forgot my password and Debian need password when booting Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org> 2019-10-27 22:20 +0100
       → Re: I forgot my password and Debian need password when booting CMH <chouck@binghamton.edu> 2019-10-28 12:30 +0100
     → Re: I forgot my password and Debian need password when booting CMH <chouck@binghamton.edu> 2024-11-28 21:40 +0100
 
(No Subject) (2 replies) "Sergey S." <hello@8am.dev> 2024-11-28 10:30 +0100
   → Re: (No Subject) "Sergey S." <hello@8am.dev> 2024-11-28 11:00 +0100
   → Re: (No Subject) Povl Ole Haarlev Olsen <debian-security@stderr.dk> 2024-11-28 11:20 +0100
 
bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record (7 replies) Guillaume Bienkowski <guillaume.bienkowski@braincube.com> 2024-07-26 17:30 +0200
   → Re: bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Lee <ler762@gmail.com> 2024-07-26 21:50 +0200
     → Re: bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> 2024-07-28 07:40 +0200
       → Re: bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org> 2024-07-28 10:30 +0200
         → Re: bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Guillaume Bienkowski <guillaume.bienkowski@braincube.com> 2024-07-28 18:30 +0200
         → Re: bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org> 2024-07-29 12:20 +0200
           → Re: bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> 2024-07-29 15:30 +0200
             → Re: bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Guillaume Bienkowski <guillaume.bienkowski@braincube.com> 2024-11-28 10:30 +0100
 
Latent bugs in armel, armhf packages built before t64 transition (3 replies) Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org> 2024-08-16 00:30 +0200
   → Re: Latent bugs in armel, armhf packages built before t64 transition Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org> 2024-08-16 10:30 +0200
     → Re: Latent bugs in armel, armhf packages built before t64 transition Martin <debacle@debian.org> 2024-11-27 23:50 +0100
   → Re: Latent bugs in armel, armhf packages built before t64 transition Leandro Cunha <leandrocunha016@gmail.com> 2024-11-28 00:30 +0100
 
Securing Debian Manual, Out of Date? debianmailinglists.hz5zm@simplelogin.com 2024-11-17 03:20 +0100
 
Fwd: gnome-settings-daemon breaks existing usbguard rules, allowing all usb device by default jan kapoli <jankapoli@proton.me> 2024-11-16 00:10 +0100
 
Re: Bug#539352: /etc/init.d/mountkernfs.sh: Please mount debugfs when available in the kernel Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk> 2024-11-11 19:50 +0100
 
Upcoming stable point releases: 12.8 and 12.9 (1 reply) Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org> 2024-10-13 12:50 +0200
   → Re: Upcoming stable point releases: 12.8 and 12.9 "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> 2024-11-09 11:40 +0100

~Page 1 of ~15 (articles 6372–6504) Older →


csiph-web