Re: ftp.debian.org: remove armel from forky and unstable

From	Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.security, linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject	Re: ftp.debian.org: remove armel from forky and unstable
Date	2025-09-27 17:20 +0200
Message-ID	<LzESl-ZYY-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<Lz20F-z14-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LzhVM-JrP-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <LzpTk-Phu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <LzAYq-XqK-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, 27 Sep 2025, Sylvain Beucler wrote:

> Wrt e-waste, Raspberry Pi OS still supports a specific armhf-v6 32-bit build,
[…]
> Maybe it would make more sense to switch to that?

It’s also buggy and generally bad vibes. There’s reasons I stick
to plain Debian, despite all the controverse from the recent years.

As for funding… I don’t think it should be I to approach the RPi
foundation. I *can* ask around on Fedi, if it is indeed “just” a
funding issue.

Thanks,
//mirabilos
-- 
15:41⎜<Lo-lan-do:#fusionforge> Somebody write a testsuite for helloworld :-)

Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: ftp.debian.org: remove armel from forky and unstable Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org> - 2025-09-25 23:50 +0200
  Re: ftp.debian.org: remove armel from forky and unstable Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org> - 2025-09-27 17:20 +0200
  Re: ftp.debian.org: remove armel from forky and unstable Sylvain Beucler <beuc@beuc.net> - 2025-09-26 16:50 +0200
    Re: ftp.debian.org: remove armel from forky and unstable Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org> - 2025-09-27 01:20 +0200
      Re: ftp.debian.org: remove armel from forky and unstable Sylvain Beucler <beuc@beuc.net> - 2025-09-27 13:10 +0200
    Re: ftp.debian.org: remove armel from forky and unstable Jochen Sprickerhof <jspricke@debian.org> - 2025-09-26 18:50 +0200

csiph-web