Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > linux.debian.security > #6424

Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped)

From Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.security
Subject Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped)
Date 2025-06-03 23:30 +0200
Message-ID <KTHmN-7ZNY-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <KHyoV-hxNz-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <KKYdb-29FY-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <KN7YJ-3Aav-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <KNPn3-41ii-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 06:43:37PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Santiago,
> 
> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 03:20:36PM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> > 
> > Would you be OK if we track the above proposal on a salsa issue in,
> > https://salsa.debian.org/security-tracker-team/security-tracker/-/issues?
> > If you are OK, I could volunteer to file the issue. But I'd be happy if
> > Samuel files it too.
> > 
> > As you are aware, the Debian LTS team is planning to hold a sprint
> > during DebCamp 25.  And if the above proposal is beneficial for you too
> > (I think this would help us in the context of LTS and ELTS), it would be
> > great to include it in the "target issues" to be addressed in the
> > context of the sprint.
> 
> Given during development there will be needed review, maybe subtask
> etc ... yes I agree that we can start tracking the tasks around the
> nonissue state as issue in the tracker. 
> 
> So to move it outside of a mail thread directly to the salsa.
> 
For the sake of completeness, here is the issue that Samuel has written:
https://salsa.debian.org/security-tracker-team/security-tracker/-/issues/32

Regards,

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sánchez

Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported  false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique <samueloph@debian.org> - 2024-11-28 00:50 +0100
  Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported  false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-12-01 15:10 +0100
    Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported  false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique <samueloph@debian.org> - 2025-03-02 21:50 +0100
      Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported  false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique <samueloph@debian.org> - 2025-04-13 17:30 +0200
        Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported  false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-04-13 17:40 +0200
      Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported  false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique <samueloph@debian.org> - 2025-04-13 18:10 +0200
        Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported  false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-05-01 11:30 +0200
          Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported  false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique <samueloph@debian.org> - 2025-05-10 21:40 +0200
            Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported  false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Santiago Ruano Rincón <santiagorr@riseup.net> - 2025-05-16 20:30 +0200
              Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported  false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-05-18 18:50 +0200
                Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported  false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2025-06-03 23:30 +0200

csiph-web