Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > linux.debian.security > #6384
| From | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.security |
| Subject | Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) |
| Date | 2024-12-01 15:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <JOSO5-d0iA-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <JNzXb-c5Oi-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Samuel, On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 11:28:50PM +0000, Samuel Henrique wrote: > Hello Salvatore, > > On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 at 20:02, Samuel Henrique <samueloph@debian.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 at 19:43, Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> wrote: > > > As mentioned in an earlier message: What I would love to see is to > > > actually have a substate which makes the situation clear, and still > > > beeing technically correct. I was envisioning something which would be > > > a substate like we have for the substate of no-dsa (ignored, > > > postponed). > > > > This sounds like the solution proposal A2, quoting it: > > > ## A2) Add a new mutually exclusive state to the set: > > "not-affected-build-artifacts" > > > > Would this be aligned to what you're looking for? > > Could you check if the suggestion above addresses your concern? Not yet, but I will try to schedule a bit of time in the next weeks for security-tracker stuff and have a look at this. Regards, Salvatore
Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique <samueloph@debian.org> - 2024-11-28 00:50 +0100
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-12-01 15:10 +0100
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique <samueloph@debian.org> - 2025-03-02 21:50 +0100
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique <samueloph@debian.org> - 2025-04-13 17:30 +0200
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-04-13 17:40 +0200
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique <samueloph@debian.org> - 2025-04-13 18:10 +0200
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-05-01 11:30 +0200
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique <samueloph@debian.org> - 2025-05-10 21:40 +0200
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Santiago Ruano Rincón <santiagorr@riseup.net> - 2025-05-16 20:30 +0200
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-05-18 18:50 +0200
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2025-06-03 23:30 +0200
csiph-web