Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8479
| From | Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python, linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Re: Bug#823052: ITP: python-mkdocs-bootswatch -- Bootswatch themes for MkDocs |
| Date | 2016-05-01 13:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rtY2R-ue-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rtBpD-72n-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rtDKO-Fh-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rtWaK-7nA-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Brian May, 2016-05-01] > > please don't use python- prefix, use mkdocs-bootswatch. Note that binary > > package is "mkdocs" > > Ok, so I just call both source *and* binary packages mkdocs-bootswatch > and mkdocs-bootstrap then? yes please > mkdocs was required for a DPMT package - django-rest-framework - and > this is the only reason I bother to package it. It is already in DPMT. we do not add libfoo package to DPMT (written in C/Perl/whatever) if its Python wrapper "foo" module requires it. We do not maintain gcc even though it's required by a lot of our packages. I'm sorry, but IMO one of the main reason of having teams in Debian is to group people interested in similar topics. I don't want to touch Perl or JavaScript and I'm grateful to people who maintain libraries for these languages for me. Someone long time ago decided to create a team to maintain Python modules, this team already has so many packages that almost nobody reads -team mailing list so I don't want to make it even worse (and scare these few people who still read it) and add Python applications or $UGLYLANG libraries there. If someone wants to package python-bar that requires bar-perl, IMO the best way (especially when you don't have that great Perl knowledge) is to join Perl team to help you maintain bar-perl and encourage Perl Team guys to maintain python-baz within our team if their baz-perl needs python-baz > I tried to get access to PAPT (so I could fix another package), however > so far haven't got a response. I guess I missed your request email on this mailing list, sorry. Let me know if you're still interested > I would sooner maintain them in collab-maint rather then PAPT, because I > don't really want to have to convert my git repositories to > subversion. I believe subversion is still required by PAPT. it is -- Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer www.ozarowski.pl www.griffith.cc www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#823052: ITP: python-mkdocs-bootswatch -- Bootswatch themes for MkDocs Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2016-04-30 13:40 +0200
Re: Bug#823052: ITP: python-mkdocs-bootswatch -- Bootswatch themes for MkDocs Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-04-30 16:10 +0200
Re: Bug#823052: ITP: python-mkdocs-bootswatch -- Bootswatch themes for MkDocs Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2016-05-01 11:50 +0200
Re: Bug#823052: ITP: python-mkdocs-bootswatch -- Bootswatch themes for MkDocs Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-05-01 13:50 +0200
csiph-web