Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Piotr =?utf-8?Q?O=C5=BCarowski?= Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python,linux.debian.bugs.dist Subject: Re: Bug#823052: ITP: python-mkdocs-bootswatch -- Bootswatch themes for MkDocs Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 13:50:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun May 1 11:48:44 2016 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -6.1 Mail-Followup-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org, 823052@bugs.debian.org, 823053@bugs.debian.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux (4.3.0-0.bpo.1-amd64) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/13807 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20160501114817.GE2764@sar0.p1otr.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 43 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 13:48:18 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <20160501114817.GE2764@sar0.p1otr.com> X-Original-References: <146201569721.16127.16369483807937958775.reportbug@prune.linuxpenguins.xyz> <20160430140928.GD2764@sar0.p1otr.com> <87bn4qw1u5.fsf@prune.linuxpenguins.xyz> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:8479 linux.debian.bugs.dist:735729 [Brian May, 2016-05-01] > > please don't use python- prefix, use mkdocs-bootswatch. Note that binary > > package is "mkdocs" > > Ok, so I just call both source *and* binary packages mkdocs-bootswatch > and mkdocs-bootstrap then? yes please > mkdocs was required for a DPMT package - django-rest-framework - and > this is the only reason I bother to package it. It is already in DPMT. we do not add libfoo package to DPMT (written in C/Perl/whatever) if its Python wrapper "foo" module requires it. We do not maintain gcc even though it's required by a lot of our packages. I'm sorry, but IMO one of the main reason of having teams in Debian is to group people interested in similar topics. I don't want to touch Perl or JavaScript and I'm grateful to people who maintain libraries for these languages for me. Someone long time ago decided to create a team to maintain Python modules, this team already has so many packages that almost nobody reads -team mailing list so I don't want to make it even worse (and scare these few people who still read it) and add Python applications or $UGLYLANG libraries there. If someone wants to package python-bar that requires bar-perl, IMO the best way (especially when you don't have that great Perl knowledge) is to join Perl team to help you maintain bar-perl and encourage Perl Team guys to maintain python-baz within our team if their baz-perl needs python-baz > I tried to get access to PAPT (so I could fix another package), however > so far haven't got a response. I guess I missed your request email on this mailing list, sorry. Let me know if you're still interested > I would sooner maintain them in collab-maint rather then PAPT, because I > don't really want to have to convert my git repositories to > subversion. I believe subversion is still required by PAPT. it is -- Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer www.ozarowski.pl www.griffith.cc www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645