Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8477

Re: Bug#823052: ITP: python-mkdocs-bootswatch -- Bootswatch themes for MkDocs

From Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python, linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject Re: Bug#823052: ITP: python-mkdocs-bootswatch -- Bootswatch themes for MkDocs
Date 2016-05-01 11:50 +0200
Message-ID <rtWaK-7nA-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rtBpD-72n-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rtDKO-Fh-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Debian

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


> please don't use python- prefix, use mkdocs-bootswatch. Note that binary
> package is "mkdocs"

Ok, so I just call both source *and* binary packages mkdocs-bootswatch
and mkdocs-bootstrap then?

>> I plan to maintain this as part of the DPMT - Debian Python Modules
>> Team.
>
> I think PAPT is more appropriate for mkdocs. I don't think it is also
> appropriate for themes, but since mkdocs-bootswatch/mkdocs-bootstrap are
> tightly related to another DPMT^W PAPT package, IMHO we can make an
> exception in PAPT for them (but I'd prefer to have them outside the
> team, TBH - DPMT/PAPT are not collab-maint replacements).

mkdocs was required for a DPMT package - django-rest-framework - and
this is the only reason I bother to package it. It is already in DPMT.

Recent mkdocs has split up, and now requires these packages too.

I tried to get access to PAPT (so I could fix another package), however
so far haven't got a response.

I would sooner maintain them in collab-maint rather then PAPT, because I
don't really want to have to convert my git repositories to
subversion. I believe subversion is still required by PAPT.
-- 
Brian May <bam@debian.org>

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#823052: ITP: python-mkdocs-bootswatch -- Bootswatch themes for MkDocs Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2016-04-30 13:40 +0200
  Re: Bug#823052: ITP: python-mkdocs-bootswatch -- Bootswatch themes  for MkDocs Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-04-30 16:10 +0200
    Re: Bug#823052: ITP: python-mkdocs-bootswatch -- Bootswatch themes for MkDocs Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2016-05-01 11:50 +0200
      Re: Bug#823052: ITP: python-mkdocs-bootswatch -- Bootswatch themes  for MkDocs Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-05-01 13:50 +0200

csiph-web