Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #7451
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick |
| Date | Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:40:02 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qg06K-5oO-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qeViO-2oq-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qfdpo-37r-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qfZu1-4r5-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-python@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Oct 4 22:37:42 2015 |
| Old-Return-Path | <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-5.7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .microcomaustralia. - helo: .mail-ig0-x22b.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=0; rate: -5 |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microcomaustralia.com.au; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=uzJYRhJIkJNDp3OME/SakCFxZvgDKcda+/WEcYjvh/k=; b=d5uvc1s3K8Q9OBthHTtcYf23QrYQazy+jAkyXJhrXyHvLMGTBLZOLhRcyJIyoyrL+z 7cpkoKjnXxHIh3U52MtCXWerWAUcQih+vgM/6Bob7n89S5fFp2ZCk/nrDqrxuhIHzmTY Uvyn7lzffR+QK1/uhxz21vMUcLouaV+H3S8DE= |
| X-Google-Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=uzJYRhJIkJNDp3OME/SakCFxZvgDKcda+/WEcYjvh/k=; b=iGpxm1ITkJR1fEbFbb98SAiykr06E7YVU787NlG51EDZHVDlc57pfuxrj3STNhyjjy PtQ7pEDuMAtXNa7jm73siWqIir2s8ubZ+zEW5VXXOTN+3eDzRXFms40y/pWwy4LiAktu mxbc4/LVuZD44EpQCE25qksklng52QPumr4E5NCbHL/eqBU4LGVg+awrEmDKpxpAGnAt aq0jLmpA+jAyO+yIyecSKRYgyo8Wo6wecrfwBFNc0BEbEGQmgjizU3LA5o0TW3q41TEY krOSCPBd+vMPFN5xVMiRNsuJx9+e/f8RBpQxUYm148FjrCyImadsOKrmrrRADPGehSS0 myoQ== |
| X-Gm-Message-State | ALoCoQlyMWX4HBlBCtuW/oUM7FIGE6L54+MxsxoytL6SjKYqOYnyr4Nr3WnAEnoESVqCQA/xNRwN |
| X-Received | by 10.50.6.16 with SMTP id w16mr6906432igw.74.1443998242626; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 15:37:22 -0700 (PDT) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7ba979724efa5005214f0ae1 |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/12762 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAA0ZO6CP7zCa4EXy8DGOYCarJh_263TcW+YTyy3wX=LY8tBHmQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 101 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Sun, 04 Oct 2015 22:37:13 +0000 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <CAA0ZO6CP7zCa4EXy8DGOYCarJh_263TcW+YTyy3wX=LY8tBHmQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-Original-References | <20151001231800.GC3965@p1otr.com> <3141207.gNu2uqo0GS@kitterma-e6430> <20151004215418.GA3645@bach.rivera.co.za> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:7451 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 at 08:54 Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> wrote: > There's a fundamental question to ask here. Do we want to welcome Python > packages into the team, or do we want to put up barriers and require a > level of commitment before packages can be brought into the team? Speaking for myself, I welcome anybody working on 'my' packages. As in making changes to subversion/git or even uploading packages. Sure mistakes can happen, packages might even become broken, however I think the risks of packages going unmaintained is far more damaging. I had several packages or mine fail to get into Jessie, because of trivial release critical bugs in dependent packages, and the official maintainer ignored the bug reports. I believe this is why we have team maintainers - so anybody can work on the packages. Yes - I could have also done an immediate NMU - however not being the maintainer I wasn't aware of the release critical bug until the packages had been removed and it was too late to do anything - the release team wouldn't let one package back in despite the fact the only bug was a problem with the copyright file. My impression is that it is a minority that get upset when people upload 'their' packages to the Debian archive without asking for permission first. I think these people tend to be active developers, so maybe these maintainers should be treated as special cases? My understanding - correct me if I am wrong - is that nobody has ever complained about committing changes to subversion/git. Which rather puzzles me that Thomas Goirand was removed from DPMT and PAPT - I believe (am I mistaken?) this removes his ability to commit changes to subversion (which was OK), but not remove his ability to upload packages (which was not always OK). > On the other hand, if we raise barriers, we reduce the size and > influence of the team. The few packages we maintain, we can probably > maintain to a higher standard. Maybe there'd be less bickering, because > we'd be working together more (not that I think we have much). > Newcomers would be rarer (there's a commitment) but more valuable to the > team. Or would we start to attract people faster because of our level of > activity? > With fewer packages in the team, we would end up with more packages being out-of-date and poorly maintained. This would lead to even more people installing packages directly using pip, and Debian packaging would become less relevant for Python developers.
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
[DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-02 01:20 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-02 09:50 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> - 2015-10-02 10:20 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-02 10:40 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> - 2015-10-02 11:00 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-02 11:20 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2015-10-05 12:40 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Elena ``of Valhalla'' <elena.valhalla@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 11:00 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-02 11:30 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Elena ``of Valhalla'' <elena.valhalla@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 13:40 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-02 16:40 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-02 13:30 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org> - 2015-10-02 18:20 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-10-02 20:30 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2015-10-05 12:00 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Arthur de Jong <adejong@debian.org> - 2015-10-07 14:10 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-07 14:20 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2015-10-07 14:40 +0200
team vs individual as maintainer (was: radical changes) "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2015-10-07 14:40 +0200
Re: team vs individual as maintainer (was: radical changes) Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-07 15:30 +0200
Re: team vs individual as maintainer Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-07 15:40 +0200
Re: team vs individual as maintainer "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2015-10-07 15:50 +0200
Re: team vs individual as maintainer Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-07 15:50 +0200
Re: team vs individual as maintainer Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-07 16:10 +0200
Re: team vs individual as maintainer Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-07 16:20 +0200
Re: team vs individual as maintainer Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-17 00:00 +0200
git instead of svn in policy (was Re: team vs individual as maintainer) IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2015-10-17 20:20 +0200
Re: git instead of svn in DPMT policy Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-17 20:50 +0200
Re: git instead of svn in DPMT policy Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au> - 2015-10-18 03:10 +0200
Re: git instead of svn in DPMT policy Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2015-10-18 13:50 +0200
Re: git instead of svn in DPMT policy Barry Warsaw <barry@python.org> - 2015-10-19 18:10 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Arthur de Jong <adejong@debian.org> - 2015-10-07 15:40 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org> - 2015-10-07 17:10 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2015-10-07 18:30 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-10-02 20:40 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2015-10-05 00:00 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au> - 2015-10-05 00:40 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-10-05 13:30 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-06 00:10 +0200
Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-10-03 01:40 +0200
csiph-web