Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #17088

review for python-atom/0.11.0-1

From Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject review for python-atom/0.11.0-1
Date 2025-09-29 18:20 +0200
Message-ID <LAoLw-1vgf-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

hi Alexander,

I took a look at the python-atom package, up for sponsorship in the
Python team:

* diff between orig tarball from uscan and pristine-tar branch
  (output from tardiff -m -s):
  + PKG-INFO
  + atom.egg-info
  + atom.egg-info/PKG-INFO
  + atom.egg-info/SOURCES.txt
  + atom.egg-info/dependency_links.txt
  + atom.egg-info/requires.txt
  + atom.egg-info/top_level.txt
  + atom/version.py
  + setup.cfg

* control: possible missing build-dep on python3-psutil, (optional)
  import at tests/test_mem.py:21

* control: version requirements for the build-deps on
  python3-setuptools, python3-setuptools-scm, python3-cppy are
  ancient (already met in oldstable), please remove.

* d/.docs, d/.examples: files could be moved to the documentation pkg?

* rules: override of dh_sphinxdoc might ignore nodoc build profile.


I assume the initial upload was rejected over missing copyright info?

Once the above comments have been addressed, simply re-add the
package to the IRC channel topic and/or ping me by e-mail.

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar


Thread

review for python-atom/0.11.0-1 Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> - 2025-09-29 18:20 +0200
  Re: review for python-atom/0.11.0-1 Alexander Sulfrian <alexander@sulfrian.net> - 2025-09-30 10:20 +0200

csiph-web