Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #17088
| From | Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | review for python-atom/0.11.0-1 |
| Date | 2025-09-29 18:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <LAoLw-1vgf-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
hi Alexander, I took a look at the python-atom package, up for sponsorship in the Python team: * diff between orig tarball from uscan and pristine-tar branch (output from tardiff -m -s): + PKG-INFO + atom.egg-info + atom.egg-info/PKG-INFO + atom.egg-info/SOURCES.txt + atom.egg-info/dependency_links.txt + atom.egg-info/requires.txt + atom.egg-info/top_level.txt + atom/version.py + setup.cfg * control: possible missing build-dep on python3-psutil, (optional) import at tests/test_mem.py:21 * control: version requirements for the build-deps on python3-setuptools, python3-setuptools-scm, python3-cppy are ancient (already met in oldstable), please remove. * d/.docs, d/.examples: files could be moved to the documentation pkg? * rules: override of dh_sphinxdoc might ignore nodoc build profile. I assume the initial upload was rejected over missing copyright info? Once the above comments have been addressed, simply re-add the package to the IRC channel topic and/or ping me by e-mail.
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
review for python-atom/0.11.0-1 Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> - 2025-09-29 18:20 +0200 Re: review for python-atom/0.11.0-1 Alexander Sulfrian <alexander@sulfrian.net> - 2025-09-30 10:20 +0200
csiph-web