Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #17089
| From | Alexander Sulfrian <alexander@sulfrian.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: review for python-atom/0.11.0-1 |
| Date | 2025-09-30 10:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <LADKx-1Fjh-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <LAoLw-1vgf-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi Jeroen, thanks for the quick and detailed review. On 9/29/25 18:17, Jeroen Ploemen wrote: > * diff between orig tarball from uscan and pristine-tar branch > (output from tardiff -m -s): > + PKG-INFO > + atom.egg-info > + atom.egg-info/PKG-INFO > + atom.egg-info/SOURCES.txt > + atom.egg-info/dependency_links.txt > + atom.egg-info/requires.txt > + atom.egg-info/top_level.txt > + atom/version.py > + setup.cfg I do not know how that could happen. Maybe I started the package with the pypi distribution tar. I recreated the repo (and the pristine-tar) branch from the uscan information. > * control: possible missing build-dep on python3-psutil, (optional) > import at tests/test_mem.py:21 Thanks for catching this, dependency added. I added (and forwarded to upstream) a patch to fix a type hint error while building the documentation and added the examples to pybuild.testfiles. Now all tests are run and only one tests is skipped intentionally. > * control: version requirements for the build-deps on > python3-setuptools, python3-setuptools-scm, python3-cppy are > ancient (already met in oldstable), please remove. Removed. > * d/.docs, d/.examples: files could be moved to the documentation pkg? Done. As the examples are already referenced in the generated sphinx documentation, I added jdupes to link the same files. Keeping the examples under /usr/share/doc/python-atom-doc/examples/ might improve the discoverability. > * rules: override of dh_sphinxdoc might ignore nodoc build profile. Fixed. > I assume the initial upload was rejected over missing copyright info? Yes. Once the new upload is sponsored I would reply to the ftpmasters, that the issues in the copyright file are fixed. Thanks, Alex
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
review for python-atom/0.11.0-1 Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> - 2025-09-29 18:20 +0200 Re: review for python-atom/0.11.0-1 Alexander Sulfrian <alexander@sulfrian.net> - 2025-09-30 10:20 +0200
csiph-web