Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #17088

review for python-atom/0.11.0-1

Path	csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	review for python-atom/0.11.0-1
Date	Mon, 29 Sep 2025 18:20:02 +0200
Message-ID	<LAoLw-1vgf-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Sep 29 16:17:42 2025
Old-Return-Path	<jcfp@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-112.81 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Mailer	Claws Mail 4.3.1 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_//JeoFp8zI6C4kFlWFiTTeaq"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Debian-User	jcfp
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23274
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20250929161713.5587aa67@debian.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	60
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date	Mon, 29 Sep 2025 16:17:13 -0000
X-Original-Message-ID	<20250929161713.5587aa67@debian.org>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:17088

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

hi Alexander,

I took a look at the python-atom package, up for sponsorship in the
Python team:

* diff between orig tarball from uscan and pristine-tar branch
  (output from tardiff -m -s):
  + PKG-INFO
  + atom.egg-info
  + atom.egg-info/PKG-INFO
  + atom.egg-info/SOURCES.txt
  + atom.egg-info/dependency_links.txt
  + atom.egg-info/requires.txt
  + atom.egg-info/top_level.txt
  + atom/version.py
  + setup.cfg

* control: possible missing build-dep on python3-psutil, (optional)
  import at tests/test_mem.py:21

* control: version requirements for the build-deps on
  python3-setuptools, python3-setuptools-scm, python3-cppy are
  ancient (already met in oldstable), please remove.

* d/.docs, d/.examples: files could be moved to the documentation pkg?

* rules: override of dh_sphinxdoc might ignore nodoc build profile.


I assume the initial upload was rejected over missing copyright info?

Once the above comments have been addressed, simply re-add the
package to the IRC channel topic and/or ping me by e-mail.

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

review for python-atom/0.11.0-1 Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> - 2025-09-29 18:20 +0200
  Re: review for python-atom/0.11.0-1 Alexander Sulfrian <alexander@sulfrian.net> - 2025-09-30 10:20 +0200

csiph-web