Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16791

Re: pybuild autopkgtest

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.usenet.ovh!news.corradoroberto.it!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: pybuild autopkgtest
Date Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:50:01 +0100
Message-ID <Kqfsl-62v1-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <KqaVI-5ZBp-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <Kqbyp-604r-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <KqbRL-60bi-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <KqbRL-60bi-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Kqcut-60E4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <KqdTA-61Ex-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <Kqewh-61Tu-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <KqeZj-62kp-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Mar 14 15:45:11 2025
Old-Return-Path <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-2.896 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate:hard: -5.5
Dkim-Filter OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zmtaout05.partage.renater.fr 1D12CA00C5
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Mailer Zimbra 8.8.15_GA_4652 (ZimbraWebClient - FF136 (Linux)/8.8.15_GA_4652)
Thread-Topic pybuild autopkgtest
Thread-Index Viz78eOnR8T6x2/aSBVyQ4ujYtCy2Q==
X-Virus-Status Clean
X-Renater-Ptge-Spamstate clean
X-Renater-Ptge-Spamcause gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgddufeduudelucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecutffgpfetvffgtfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvvefkjghfufggtgfgofhtsehtjegttdiitdejnecuhfhrohhmpefrkfevveetucfhrhgvuggvrhhitgdqgfhmmhgrnhhuvghluceofhhrvgguvghrihgtqdgvmhhmrghnuhgvlhdrphhitggtrgesshihnhgthhhrohhtrhhonhdqshholhgvihhlrdhfrheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepleefkeeujefgjeeigefgffffudegheefgfeffeethfetkedtiedvhfeijeeifefgnecukfhppedutddrvdehgedrvdegtddrudegheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpedutddrvdehgedrvdegtddrudeghedphhgvlhhopeiishhtohhrvgdqsgefqddtuddvrdhprghrthgrghgvrdhrvghnrghtvghrrdhfrhdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehfrhgvuggvrhhitgdqvghmmhgrnhhuvghlrdhpihgttggrsehshihntghhrhhothhrohhnqdhsohhlvghilhdrfhhrpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedvpdhrtghpthhtohepfihrrghrseguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopeguvggsihgrnhdqphihthhhohhnsehlihhsthhsrdguvggsihgrnhdrohhrgh
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/22907
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/1079535114.77663504.1741966048124.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 24
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:27:28 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-Message-ID <1079535114.77663504.1741966048124.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
X-Original-References <8734ff28a2.fsf@page> <Z9QTmAAW_Pi-VAu3@belkar.wrar.name> <974218039.77306937.1741952574790.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> <Z9QYUCTxDx6-5728@belkar.wrar.name> <1120871038.77351934.1741954644346.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> <ce2e416f-12f8-47f8-91a9-7bf705e8c11f@t-online.de> <198330345.77551379.1741962249309.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> <Z9RG2a5rzOI_pww3@belkar.wrar.name>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16791

Show key headers only | View raw


> Runtime sure, and we already use that.


Do you have a pointer to this logic, It would be great to be able to update the B-D via this mecanisme like we do with cabal-debian.
We should have a pip-debian which could take care of upgrading the B-D in the control file each time we integrate a new upstream version.

> Test no, they aren't even specified
> in an uniform way in the upstream code (it could be e.g. a
> tests/requirements.txt, one or several lists of deps in tox.ini or a
> custom pip install line in the CI job definition, or nothing at all if
> they run tests only locally and manually).

This is a pity..., it will defeat automatic packaging...

> That makes sense. Or maybe it should get only the B-D annotated with
> !nocheck if those exist.

this is something I was wondering also.

but usualy we do not tag with <!nocheck> the runtime dependecies in the B-D field.

Do we need to have the run-time in the B-D in order to build the package (without running the test ?)

FRed

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

pybuild autopkgtest picca <picca@debian.org> - 2025-03-14 12:00 +0100
  Re: pybuild autopkgtest Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-03-14 12:00 +0100
    Re: pybuild autopkgtest PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-03-14 12:30 +0100
      Re: pybuild autopkgtest Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> - 2025-03-14 12:40 +0100
      Re: pybuild autopkgtest Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-03-14 12:40 +0100
        Re: pybuild autopkgtest Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-03-14 13:00 +0100
          Re: pybuild autopkgtest PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-03-14 13:40 +0100
            Re: pybuild autopkgtest Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@t-online.de> - 2025-03-14 15:10 +0100
              Re: pybuild autopkgtest PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-03-14 15:50 +0100
                Re: pybuild autopkgtest Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-03-14 16:20 +0100
                Re: pybuild autopkgtest PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-03-14 16:50 +0100
                Re: pybuild autopkgtest Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-03-14 17:20 +0100
            Re: pybuild autopkgtest Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-03-14 16:00 +0100
              Re: pybuild autopkgtest Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-03-14 16:30 +0100
                Re: pybuild autopkgtest PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-03-14 16:50 +0100
              Re: pybuild autopkgtest PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-03-14 16:40 +0100
              Re: pybuild autopkgtest Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2025-03-14 17:00 +0100
        Re: pybuild autopkgtest PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-03-14 13:10 +0100

csiph-web