Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16791
| From | PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: pybuild autopkgtest |
| Date | 2025-03-14 16:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <Kqfsl-62v1-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <KqbRL-60bi-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Kqcut-60E4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <KqdTA-61Ex-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <Kqewh-61Tu-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <KqeZj-62kp-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> Runtime sure, and we already use that. Do you have a pointer to this logic, It would be great to be able to update the B-D via this mecanisme like we do with cabal-debian. We should have a pip-debian which could take care of upgrading the B-D in the control file each time we integrate a new upstream version. > Test no, they aren't even specified > in an uniform way in the upstream code (it could be e.g. a > tests/requirements.txt, one or several lists of deps in tox.ini or a > custom pip install line in the CI job definition, or nothing at all if > they run tests only locally and manually). This is a pity..., it will defeat automatic packaging... > That makes sense. Or maybe it should get only the B-D annotated with > !nocheck if those exist. this is something I was wondering also. but usualy we do not tag with <!nocheck> the runtime dependecies in the B-D field. Do we need to have the run-time in the B-D in order to build the package (without running the test ?) FRed
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
pybuild autopkgtest picca <picca@debian.org> - 2025-03-14 12:00 +0100
Re: pybuild autopkgtest Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-03-14 12:00 +0100
Re: pybuild autopkgtest PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-03-14 12:30 +0100
Re: pybuild autopkgtest Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> - 2025-03-14 12:40 +0100
Re: pybuild autopkgtest Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-03-14 12:40 +0100
Re: pybuild autopkgtest Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-03-14 13:00 +0100
Re: pybuild autopkgtest PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-03-14 13:40 +0100
Re: pybuild autopkgtest Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@t-online.de> - 2025-03-14 15:10 +0100
Re: pybuild autopkgtest PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-03-14 15:50 +0100
Re: pybuild autopkgtest Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-03-14 16:20 +0100
Re: pybuild autopkgtest PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-03-14 16:50 +0100
Re: pybuild autopkgtest Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-03-14 17:20 +0100
Re: pybuild autopkgtest Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-03-14 16:00 +0100
Re: pybuild autopkgtest Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-03-14 16:30 +0100
Re: pybuild autopkgtest PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-03-14 16:50 +0100
Re: pybuild autopkgtest PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-03-14 16:40 +0100
Re: pybuild autopkgtest Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2025-03-14 17:00 +0100
Re: pybuild autopkgtest PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-03-14 13:10 +0100
csiph-web