Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16906

Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging

Path	csiph.com!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!news.niel.me!news.nntp4.net!news.hispagatos.org!srl.newsdeef.eu!news.corradoroberto.it!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging
Date	Wed, 11 Jun 2025 18:00:01 +0200
Message-ID	<KWw1P-9QpA-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<KWu9H-9P7V-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <KWuW5-9PHr-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <KWvyO-9Qc4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <KWvS9-9QkP-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Jun 11 15:57:10 2025
Old-Return-Path	<frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-2.896 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate:hard: -5.5
Dkim-Filter	OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zmtaout05.partage.renater.fr E934CA00D0
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Mailer	Zimbra 8.8.15_GA_4652 (ZimbraWebClient - FF128 (Linux)/8.8.15_GA_4652)
Thread-Topic	dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging
Thread-Index	TD5pdm9xPMTK5VBNXarn+xHLx1PT8A==
X-Virus-Status	Clean
X-Renater-Ptge-Spamstate	clean
X-Renater-Ptge-Spamscore	-100
X-Renater-Ptge-Spamcause	gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddugdduvdehkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucftgffptefvgfftnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefkjghfufggtgfgofhtsehtjegttdiitdejnecuhfhrohhmpefrkfevveetucfhrhgvuggvrhhitgdqgfhmmhgrnhhuvghluceofhhrvgguvghrihgtqdgvmhhmrghnuhgvlhdrphhitggtrgesshihnhgthhhrohhtrhhonhdqshholhgvihhlrdhfrheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepleefkeeujefgjeeigefgffffudegheefgfeffeethfetkedtiedvhfeijeeifefgnecukfhppedutddrvdehgedrvdegtddrudegheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpedutddrvdehgedrvdegtddrudeghedphhgvlhhopeiishhtohhrvgdqsgefqddtuddvrdhprghrthgrghgvrdhrvghnrghtvghrrdhfrhdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehfrhgvuggvrhhitgdqvghmmhgrnhhuvghlrdhpihgttggrsehshihntghhrhhothhrohhnqdhsohhlvghilhdrfhhrpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeefpdhrtghpthhtohepshhtvghfrghnohhrseguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehsrghnvhhilhgrseguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopeguvggsihgrnhdqphihthhhohhnsehlihhsthhsrdgu vggsihgrnhdrohhrgh
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23041
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/192828874.132154814.1749656444710.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	12
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>, debian-python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date	Wed, 11 Jun 2025 17:40:44 +0200 (CEST)
X-Original-Message-ID	<192828874.132154814.1749656444710.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
X-Original-References	<1779402678.132016719.1749649153102.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> <e0bd36c3-4e1a-432d-8fb9-a2bb110a82e2@debian.org> <895197705.132125083.1749654653778.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> <mr7gxxczbsbxvmjxfcuzznttr3kafruszgg75dgatva6zyjkpc@r4o3xmr744yk>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16906

Show key headers only | View raw

> This is a sitation where upstream tarballs are preferable to git.

Yes but for now the package is only distributed via git...

Even worse, it is use via a checkout and that's all.

> If you use an sdist, the egg-info / dist-info in the sdist will contain
> a file list that setuptools-scm can use.

Maybe I can generate this sdist via uscan. It would solve my problem.

Fred

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 16:00 +0200
  Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 16:50 +0200
    Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 17:10 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
    Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:40 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200
          Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 18:30 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 17:50 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> - 2025-06-11 17:50 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 18:10 +0200
    Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:50 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200
          Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging thomas@goirand.fr - 2025-06-11 18:40 +0200
            Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 18:40 +0200
              Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging stefanor@debian.org - 2025-06-11 19:30 +0200
                Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging stefanor@debian.org - 2025-06-12 11:30 +0200
                Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-12 11:50 +0200
                Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-12 11:40 +0200
              Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 19:40 +0200
              Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging thomas@goirand.fr - 2025-06-11 20:50 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200

csiph-web