Path: csiph.com!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!news.niel.me!news.nntp4.net!news.hispagatos.org!srl.newsdeef.eu!news.corradoroberto.it!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 18:00:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Stefano Rivera X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Jun 11 15:57:10 2025 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.896 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -5.5 Dkim-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zmtaout05.partage.renater.fr E934CA00D0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.15_GA_4652 (ZimbraWebClient - FF128 (Linux)/8.8.15_GA_4652) Thread-Topic: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Thread-Index: TD5pdm9xPMTK5VBNXarn+xHLx1PT8A== X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Renater-Ptge-Spamstate: clean X-Renater-Ptge-Spamscore: -100 X-Renater-Ptge-Spamcause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddugdduvdehkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucftgffptefvgfftnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefkjghfufggtgfgofhtsehtjegttdiitdejnecuhfhrohhmpefrkfevveetucfhrhgvuggvrhhitgdqgfhmmhgrnhhuvghluceofhhrvgguvghrihgtqdgvmhhmrghnuhgvlhdrphhitggtrgesshihnhgthhhrohhtrhhonhdqshholhgvihhlrdhfrheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepleefkeeujefgjeeigefgffffudegheefgfeffeethfetkedtiedvhfeijeeifefgnecukfhppedutddrvdehgedrvdegtddrudegheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpedutddrvdehgedrvdegtddrudeghedphhgvlhhopeiishhtohhrvgdqsgefqddtuddvrdhprghrthgrghgvrdhrvghnrghtvghrrdhfrhdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehfrhgvuggvrhhitgdqvghmmhgrnhhuvghlrdhpihgttggrsehshihntghhrhhothhrohhnqdhsohhlvghilhdrfhhrpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeefpdhrtghpthhtohepshhtvghfrghnohhrseguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehsrghnvhhilhgrseguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopeguvggsihgrnhdqphihthhhohhnsehlihhsthhsrdgu vggsihgrnhdrohhrgh X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/23041 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/192828874.132154814.1749656444710.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 12 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Santiago Vila , debian-python X-Original-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 17:40:44 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-Message-ID: <192828874.132154814.1749656444710.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> X-Original-References: <1779402678.132016719.1749649153102.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> <895197705.132125083.1749654653778.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16906 > This is a sitation where upstream tarballs are preferable to git. Yes but for now the package is only distributed via git... Even worse, it is use via a checkout and that's all. > If you use an sdist, the egg-info / dist-info in the sdist will contain > a file list that setuptools-scm can use. Maybe I can generate this sdist via uscan. It would solve my problem. Fred