Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16910
| From | PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging |
| Date | 2025-06-11 18:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <KWw1Q-9QpA-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <KWu9H-9P7V-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <KWuW5-9PHr-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <KWvyO-9Qc4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <KWvyO-9Qc4-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <KWvS9-9QkP-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> However, it seems the upstream build actually depends on setuptools-scm now, > they (you? :)) don't use any other way to tell the build system about > the data files - the *.png images, the *.rst documentation, etc.. > This... may be a problem if the package is not built out of a Git checkout > with Git itself present... and Debian packages are usually expected to be > built out of a plain extracted source archive, no `.git/`, no anything. I am just contributing to the project, specifficaly I try to add a proper pyproject.toml file. > I'd suggest making some changes upstream, like listing the data files yourself: > https://setuptools.pypa.io/en/latest/userguide/datafiles.html > > (or, of course, switching away from setuptools, but any build system you choose > may still need to be configured to include the data files along with your > Python module sources, although some of them do this by default for most files) setuptools is not the right tool in order to build Python projects ? Fred
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 16:00 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 16:50 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 17:10 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:40 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 18:30 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 17:50 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> - 2025-06-11 17:50 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 18:10 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:50 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging thomas@goirand.fr - 2025-06-11 18:40 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 18:40 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging stefanor@debian.org - 2025-06-11 19:30 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging stefanor@debian.org - 2025-06-12 11:30 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-12 11:50 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-12 11:40 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 19:40 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging thomas@goirand.fr - 2025-06-11 20:50 +0200
Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200
csiph-web