Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15855

Re: Status of sqlalchemy

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Martin <debacle@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Status of sqlalchemy
Date Tue, 21 May 2024 22:10:01 +0200
Message-ID <IGDY5-eUY4-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <Iadfz-bPa4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ItfAd-6iQb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Itupz-6s7W-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue May 21 20:09:14 2024
Old-Return-Path <debacle@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-110.499 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
User-Agent mu4e 1.12.4; emacs 29.3
Jabber-ID debacle@debian.org
Accept-Language de, en, es
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-Debian-User debacle
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/21885
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/87jzjnrkpx.fsf@fama.lan
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 12
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Tue, 21 May 2024 20:08:58 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID <87jzjnrkpx.fsf@fama.lan>
X-Original-References <ZdcNAJOHG1_LQBai@an3as.eu> <871q77fxdd.fsf@fama.lan> <20240415130735.fbk3cujouk7itfd3@piotr.cc>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:15855

Show key headers only | View raw

Hi Piotr,

On 2024-04-15 15:07, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> sqlalchemy 2.X currently FTBFS due to a segmentation fault (3.11 and
> 3.12) somewhere in pysqlite:
...
> I will upload to unstable once I figure that one out

Any news on that? Thank you!
(I'm not sure, if I can help with that, unfortunately.)

Cheers

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#1058265: Status of sqlalchemy Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2024-02-22 10:10 +0100
  Re: Status of sqlalchemy Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-04-14 23:30 +0200
    Re: Status of sqlalchemy Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2024-04-15 11:40 +0200
      Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy) Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-04-22 08:10 +0200
        Re: Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy) Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2024-04-22 09:50 +0200
          Re: Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy) Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-04-22 10:00 +0200
            Re: Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy) Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2024-04-22 10:10 +0200
              Re: Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy) Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-04-23 00:10 +0200
                Re: Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy) Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2024-05-13 08:30 +0200
                Re: Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy) Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2024-05-27 22:50 +0200
    Re: Status of sqlalchemy Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-04-15 12:10 +0200
    Re: Status of sqlalchemy Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2024-04-15 15:20 +0200
      Re: Status of sqlalchemy Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-04-15 17:20 +0200
      Re: Status of sqlalchemy Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-05-21 22:10 +0200
    Re: Status of sqlalchemy Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@t-online.de> - 2024-04-15 18:10 +0200

csiph-web