Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15779

Re: Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy)

From Martin <debacle@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy)
Date 2024-04-22 10:00 +0200
Message-ID <IvWKJ-830p-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <ItfAd-6iQb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ItqYF-6pVo-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ItqYF-6pVo-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <IvV2h-82ci-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <IvWB3-82Xm-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Quoting Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com>:
> I ll check back home, but it's most likely I was waiting for SQLAlchemy
> 2.xx.

Good!

> I know for share that one package does wait for SA 2.xx but can t remember
> which one.
>
>> It looksk
> like all but one of the debian/patches are obsolete now?

It seems, that *two* patches need to stay, but need work:

1. privacy-breach-fixes.patch (I updated this, can push later)

2. disable-failing-unittests.patch (needs more work, don't hold your breath)

There are also two (?) new build-depends. Again, I can push later.

debian/rules needs a minor PYTHONPATH fix. Will push when back home ;-)

Cheers

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#1058265: Status of sqlalchemy Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2024-02-22 10:10 +0100
  Re: Status of sqlalchemy Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-04-14 23:30 +0200
    Re: Status of sqlalchemy Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2024-04-15 11:40 +0200
      Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy) Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-04-22 08:10 +0200
        Re: Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy) Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2024-04-22 09:50 +0200
          Re: Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy) Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-04-22 10:00 +0200
            Re: Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy) Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2024-04-22 10:10 +0200
              Re: Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy) Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-04-23 00:10 +0200
                Re: Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy) Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2024-05-13 08:30 +0200
                Re: Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy) Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2024-05-27 22:50 +0200
    Re: Status of sqlalchemy Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-04-15 12:10 +0200
    Re: Status of sqlalchemy Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2024-04-15 15:20 +0200
      Re: Status of sqlalchemy Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-04-15 17:20 +0200
      Re: Status of sqlalchemy Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-05-21 22:10 +0200
    Re: Status of sqlalchemy Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@t-online.de> - 2024-04-15 18:10 +0200

csiph-web