Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #11523

OpenJDK 8u242 GA?

Path csiph.com!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder7.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject OpenJDK 8u242 GA?
Date Tue, 28 Jan 2020 23:10:02 +0100
Message-ID <ztHdw-79U-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Tue Jan 28 22:05:47 2020
Old-Return-Path <t.glaser@tarent.de>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, HDRS_LCASE=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -3.5
X-X-Sender tglase@tglase-nb.lan.tarent.de
User-Agent Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19)
Content-Language de-DE-1901
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding QUOTED-PRINTABLE
X-Mailing-List <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/22086
List-ID <debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2001282257590.10732@tglase-nb.lan.tarent.de
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 26
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc team@security.debian.org
X-Original-Date Tue, 28 Jan 2020 23:05:31 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-Message-ID <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2001282257590.10732@tglase-nb.lan.tarent.de>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:11523

Show key headers only | View raw


Hi *,

what’s the status of that? There’s a prerelease in sid, and
the Canonical employees have already updated even ancient
versions of *buntu, but there’s nothing in Debian, nor in
the packaging repository.

This is probably security-relevant for stretch… and GA was
planned to be released two weeks ago today as b08 (I haven’t
followed it closely, so I don’t know the precise numbers).
There’s no ETA or anything…

What I don’t understand is why the new version isn’t uploaded
to Debian and then synchronised into *buntu, would that not be
less work, even?

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
tarent solutions GmbH
Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/
Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235
HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-01-28 23:10 +0100
  Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-05 16:00 +0100
    Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-02-05 16:20 +0100
      Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-05 16:30 +0100
        Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-02-05 16:50 +0100
          Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-05 17:00 +0100
          Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-06 19:50 +0100
            Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-07 00:20 +0100
            Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-07 07:40 +0100
      Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-10 19:20 +0100
        Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2020-02-10 20:20 +0100
          Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-10 20:40 +0100

csiph-web