Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #11528

Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA?

From tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA?
Date 2020-02-05 16:50 +0100
Message-ID <zwv69-25v-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <ztHdw-79U-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <zwujL-1p8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <zwuD8-1L2-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <zwuMN-1O0-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 04:20:40PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Hi tony,
> 
> > on January 28th as a reminder).  I am in process of building the 8u242
> > source package uploaded to Debian unstable against stretch for a
> 
> thanks for the update, but… Debian unstable has not yet been updated
> to the GA release yet. Perhaps doing that first would be sensible?
> 
> If I can help in any way (I’m a DD) do tell. I regularily build the
> uploaded versions for $orkplace, see below, for precise, trusty,
> xenial (if not done by you), wheezy, jessie, and recently buster,
> locally, so I’m familiar with them.

Uhh... right (my bad; I blame jet-lag).  8u242-b04 is not what we
want.  We should start with an upload of the GA release to unstable.

I'm building on a personal laptop and not doing so as part of $dayjob,
so the builds take a bit longer for me.  Based on my chat with Matthias
at FOSDEM, we should go ahead with the Debian uploads JDK 8.

Thorsten, if you have cycles to handle the GA upload to unstable, please
go ahead and do so.  Otherwise, I will do it by the end of the week.

Thank you for the correction and pushing this forward,
tony

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-01-28 23:10 +0100
  Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-05 16:00 +0100
    Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-02-05 16:20 +0100
      Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-05 16:30 +0100
        Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-02-05 16:50 +0100
          Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-05 17:00 +0100
          Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-06 19:50 +0100
            Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-07 00:20 +0100
            Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-07 07:40 +0100
      Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-10 19:20 +0100
        Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2020-02-10 20:20 +0100
          Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-10 20:40 +0100

csiph-web