Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #11528
| From | tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? |
| Date | 2020-02-05 16:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <zwv69-25v-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ztHdw-79U-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <zwujL-1p8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <zwuD8-1L2-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <zwuMN-1O0-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 04:20:40PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Hi tony, > > > on January 28th as a reminder). I am in process of building the 8u242 > > source package uploaded to Debian unstable against stretch for a > > thanks for the update, but… Debian unstable has not yet been updated > to the GA release yet. Perhaps doing that first would be sensible? > > If I can help in any way (I’m a DD) do tell. I regularily build the > uploaded versions for $orkplace, see below, for precise, trusty, > xenial (if not done by you), wheezy, jessie, and recently buster, > locally, so I’m familiar with them. Uhh... right (my bad; I blame jet-lag). 8u242-b04 is not what we want. We should start with an upload of the GA release to unstable. I'm building on a personal laptop and not doing so as part of $dayjob, so the builds take a bit longer for me. Based on my chat with Matthias at FOSDEM, we should go ahead with the Debian uploads JDK 8. Thorsten, if you have cycles to handle the GA upload to unstable, please go ahead and do so. Otherwise, I will do it by the end of the week. Thank you for the correction and pushing this forward, tony
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-01-28 23:10 +0100
Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-05 16:00 +0100
Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-02-05 16:20 +0100
Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-05 16:30 +0100
Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-02-05 16:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-05 17:00 +0100
Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-06 19:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-07 00:20 +0100
Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-07 07:40 +0100
Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-10 19:20 +0100
Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2020-02-10 20:20 +0100
Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-02-10 20:40 +0100
csiph-web