Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #11208
| Path | csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates |
| Date | Wed, 22 May 2019 16:40:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <y0Azn-4nV-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <xZNyG-7L7-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <xZNyG-7L7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <xZPK9-xq-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <xZPK9-xq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <xZQdc-WR-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <xZQdc-WR-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <y0qTo-6RG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <y0qTn-6RG-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <y0wFs-20z-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Wed May 22 14:35:55 2019 |
| Old-Return-Path | <tmancill@gmail.com> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-12.077 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -5.5 |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=I6yKRqortnjSs9AWN009hEy0xQWZNKSRSauBa8trD9o=; b=o0x1pnRpnz1QtYAD/NQYm/nIvz3AKaHrE45Cg6Ff/Z1O2tGcC5Eea72rA7cMOojDgT 1KucT0LpVjEMCoamyuqKCIaX8hStdbj7GkaC56nFQJlG1vKxtclms4Gja+v/D1vp4IDQ h0KxTflYZjNC9KPh7LA6DRH4g/0BLMXz2YAEuzN/zSCeAh2fYyxKeqhdtA8e0oH5Qi0Z rh2U5FsHZjeDKR+zCVVONUHRh9GfxHY7MH81pKmZpNoNGI54H67i7UK/7YysHg2cet+Z DJkaKskna+Qtke45SxunxnoE/GrCeVJYo4TBElIJ7skkDJLP2N45qmGk/XMiuc1sIi1+ GD7Q== |
| X-Google-Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=I6yKRqortnjSs9AWN009hEy0xQWZNKSRSauBa8trD9o=; b=rlyaSL4AROxbEyZtT0x5//a/EmpJUeCqIOepJYSbcicl1f4++nDQPWiFRu0PIk672/ pFcthfQQZaShI54qhQyBKpqhO5dlU6z7ZWETGWwsQMFmuWIrtwHFk1P7CpXNhYJThkDi rUF+GAeztrIfBMk+LgC+ONQng1czhq/Dpq5F/DGe4eUwatjUiEcCyO8BrkGypLIsF89X ULftM6+nRWqLbPLNREStJtZH4kQarLxW65bzY22q8Cr5mugG6WIvSI/YQz45XYdXMTSl EGxVeV8qrX7PNu6W7vRQZI3gqx1VJu/JwYZflhihySU0YENy88UDtKq/wRThJkG/zOrI RrnQ== |
| X-Gm-Message-State | APjAAAUeTHJOd/xsaQF9DRGUu4axisgAwP+inQfJeZivjMmsdtDWhP1s OlupE4o1jh11EPCI+TOyTAY= |
| X-Google-SMTP-Source | APXvYqzJj2IkVEs/CZEYuEZSrK+Z1xCydMELC8R8pM5cOU+2pWKfo+wi//GrHweZGItqsrCKhqg/sQ== |
| X-Received | by 2002:a17:902:4e:: with SMTP id 72mr38585604pla.80.1558535739490; Wed, 22 May 2019 07:35:39 -0700 (PDT) |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="atsq2ilxdorbuf4z" |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| User-Agent | NeoMutt/20180716 |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/21736 |
| List-ID | <debian-java.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20190522143536.ifdvd2d5m65hecyv@kubus |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 70 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Cc | Aleksey Shipilev <shade@redhat.com>, debian-java@lists.debian.org |
| X-Original-Date | Wed, 22 May 2019 07:35:36 -0700 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <20190522143536.ifdvd2d5m65hecyv@kubus> |
| X-Original-References | <4471343c-9b11-c218-2cc4-771170fe0e84@redhat.com> <d7bd9794-cfa3-a766-659b-f90fa8b279d8@apache.org> <4312b8ae-a1e9-7780-d7f5-37a2a7ec768a@redhat.com> <67ac780f-42e1-26cc-a8ed-f26ba091a9a0@apache.org> <a7b71570-a04c-2c48-c1dd-6a0a7a18ab4c@redhat.com> <9998d96b-8745-772d-0dbb-6610d5922c05@apache.org> <9edec39c-abdd-3579-1670-ce261a299e80@redhat.com> <20190522041706.54bt4hbwgv3w6mfc@lark> <1a7e6ebb-5aac-2214-32cb-85981e69bb99@apache.org> |
| X-Original-Sender | tony mancill <tmancill@gmail.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:11208 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:24:03PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 22/05/2019 à 06:17, tony mancill a écrit : > > > For stable backports and buster, I agree that we should upload an > > 11.0.3-ga package, particularly given the vulnerabilities still present > > in 11.0.3+1: CVE-2019-2698, CVE-2019-2684, and CVE-2019-2602 > > I've uploaded 11.0.3+1 with a patch bringing it up to 11.0.3+7 to > stretch-backports yesterday, it's still pending validation. > > > > It would be nice to do the same for buster, although now that 11.0.4+x > > has been introduced to unstable, I believe we'll have to be creative > > with the naming, either by introducing an epoch or using the > > "11.0.4+1_really11.0.3-ga" trick. > > I think we should leave 11.0.4 in unstable until the GA release in July > and upload 11.0.3+7-4 directly to testing through > testing-proposed-updates. I'm volunteering to deal with this upload if > Matthias agrees. Ah, that's great if we can upload 11.0.3+7 without having to play any games with the version string. Also, I should have said explicitly that I'm also volunteering to help with uploads - both this version and going forward. > > In general, I think it would be helpful for our users if we uploaded the > > prereleases to experimental but stuck to GA releases for unstable, > > testing, and backports. I think it is easy to mistake, for example, an > > 11.0.3+x (prerelease) version in Debian with the 11.0.3 GA release being > > distributed by other projects. > > It looks like upstream is going to append a -ea suffix to the version > reported by the pre-releases [1]. This is a welcome clarification and we > should ensure our builds do it as well. > > [1] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2019-May/009369.html Excellent! Let's see if Matthias has any concerns. Cheers, tony
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2019-05-20 12:20 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2019-05-20 14:40 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2019-05-20 15:10 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2019-05-22 06:20 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2019-05-22 12:30 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2019-05-22 16:40 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2019-05-26 22:00 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2019-05-27 00:00 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2019-05-27 16:00 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2019-05-27 18:50 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2019-05-23 18:00 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg@gmail.com> - 2019-05-23 19:10 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2019-05-24 00:00 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2019-05-24 00:50 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2019-05-25 18:10 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2019-05-27 17:10 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2019-05-27 18:40 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2019-05-28 10:40 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2019-05-29 14:20 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2019-05-30 00:10 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2019-05-24 15:50 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg@gmail.com> - 2019-05-24 20:30 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2019-05-26 21:50 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2019-05-27 00:00 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2019-05-27 16:10 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2019-05-27 18:40 +0200
debian/watch file for OpenJDK (was Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates) Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2019-05-28 10:30 +0200
Re: debian/watch file for OpenJDK (was Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates) Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2019-05-28 11:20 +0200
Re: debian/watch file for OpenJDK (was Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates) Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2019-05-28 11:30 +0200
Re: debian/watch file for OpenJDK (was Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates) Tiago Daitx <tiago.daitx@canonical.com> - 2019-05-29 04:10 +0200
Re: debian/watch file for OpenJDK (was Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates) Tiago Daitx <tiago.daitx@canonical.com> - 2019-05-29 04:20 +0200
Re: debian/watch file for OpenJDK (was Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates) Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2019-05-29 14:20 +0200
Re: debian/watch file for OpenJDK (was Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates) Dalibor Topic <dalibor.topic@oracle.com> - 2019-05-29 16:00 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2019-05-30 00:00 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2019-05-30 00:30 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2019-06-10 11:40 +0200
Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg@gmail.com> - 2019-05-27 12:30 +0200
csiph-web