Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #10050
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java |
| Date | Mon, 02 Oct 2017 23:00:03 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uwfYL-zn-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u1IaC-6eJ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <u1J6F-6RW-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <u26FX-4O2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <u2Srg-1rA-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <u3bay-5vu-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <u3dm1-7bn-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <u3fnP-8td-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <u3ZAl-4rE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7TmF-7Yc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7TmG-7Yc-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <u8BnH-3H3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <u8Bxp-40f-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uuFui-8sU-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <uuJoe-2om-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <uvVQm-8jo-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uwfYL-zn-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <uwfYL-zn-43@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org>, debian-java@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Mon Oct 2 16:36:07 2017 |
| Old-Return-Path | <ebourg@apache.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-12.021 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate:hard: -7 |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20417 |
| List-ID | <debian-java.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/27bd2360-1954-ecdf-8ffc-e21cafb41f6f@apache.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 22 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Mon, 2 Oct 2017 18:35:47 +0200 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <27bd2360-1954-ecdf-8ffc-e21cafb41f6f@apache.org> |
| X-Original-References | <CAPOrs_2CgGWYHHaTfWQu2m9-CT1G7mkj8urrBU7SOO5NVjut0A@mail.gmail.com> <2987ea94-ee49-aa93-e561-b0f126f95b12@debian.org> <CAPOrs_3NGpPhddHisGF_yMOHV+YvC9K0V2edo_a4=Rp-Rg875g@mail.gmail.com> <83b2d9c2-aad1-82c0-17b9-3571d350c978@debian.org> <CAPOrs_3i77KbifjLAaD1Go5T6OJG3b2h7obPg+GdTyJU+hgENg@mail.gmail.com> <5b892ff0-305c-5b38-915d-cabd545f4764@debian.org> <CAPOrs_1h=pwB6iUBVkw_CgsH-=DkBL=158cOec_eci08agmUrw@mail.gmail.com> <7287d657-8a2b-90dc-c2f4-093d0e148748@debian.org> <CAPOrs_2ch-hBnX8okoZf61cTAqHWN6n6Kzbn5VLToqW9OWTU5g@mail.gmail.com> <de8e111d-3cfb-e73d-e11c-6a72d360e228@debian.org> <CAPOrs_11jyLYv1_YFxnzG3--26faYBT=ZhNrPKrVvEQHsYA8JA@mail.gmail.com> <6e38b9de-89d6-71f5-aac6-0da36446c5cc@debian.org> <CAPOrs_3787t3+sDTAZk4ZUqcJJUL_H0AbSFPKJ7cBV_S+oU6Ug@mail.gmail.com> <59d87384-b94e-f662-716f-6b318b30d7fa@debian.org> <8bf889ad-bd99-8f82-46d0-fbe9d3d8b937@debian.org> <46b693cb-5a53-4fd6-9cc9-ed2f51f045bd@apache.org> <0925bc7a-0dd0-350f-af8d-e7ffb580916c@debian.org> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:10050 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Le 2/10/2017 à 17:51, Markus Koschany a écrit : > There is at least one major downside of the current behavior. You > completely loose the flexibility to choose that your package is able to > run with an older version of libfoo. There is always a strict dependency > on the latest version which can be a real hassle if you try to backport > packages. Unfortunately we don't have a C/C++ mechanism like symbols > files in Java but the answer should not be to enforce a dependency on > the latest version. Ideally the version used for the resolved dependencies should be the ones defined in the pom, such that the packages express the same requirements than the Maven artifacts they contain. That would be a less strict middle ground. Regarding the backports, what the current maven-debian-helper behavior really limits is the ability to download a .deb built for sid and install it directly in stable. Rebuilding the package for stable is still possible with no extra modification, and the resolved dependencies will then refer to the versions in stable. Emmanuel Bourg
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
wanting to join the java team Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 16:50 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-07-10 17:50 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 19:00 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-07-13 22:00 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2017-07-14 10:00 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 18:00 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-07-14 20:20 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 22:30 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-07-16 23:50 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 18:00 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-07-27 18:00 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-07-29 17:00 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-07-29 17:10 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 13:50 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-09-28 18:00 +0200
Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 01:30 +0200
Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-02 23:00 +0200
Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-03 19:40 +0200
Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-02 23:20 +0200
Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 23:50 +0200
Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-10-03 17:40 +0200
Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-03 19:20 +0200
Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-10-04 17:50 +0200
Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-04 19:20 +0200
Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-10-05 13:10 +0200
Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-05 14:40 +0200
csiph-web