Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #10050

Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java
Date Mon, 02 Oct 2017 23:00:03 +0200
Message-ID <uwfYL-zn-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <u1IaC-6eJ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <u1J6F-6RW-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <u26FX-4O2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <u2Srg-1rA-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <u3bay-5vu-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <u3dm1-7bn-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <u3fnP-8td-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <u3ZAl-4rE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7TmF-7Yc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7TmG-7Yc-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <u8BnH-3H3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <u8Bxp-40f-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uuFui-8sU-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <uuJoe-2om-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <uvVQm-8jo-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uwfYL-zn-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <uwfYL-zn-43@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org>, debian-java@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Mon Oct 2 16:36:07 2017
Old-Return-Path <ebourg@apache.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-12.021 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate:hard: -7
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Mailing-List <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20417
List-ID <debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/27bd2360-1954-ecdf-8ffc-e21cafb41f6f@apache.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 22
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Mon, 2 Oct 2017 18:35:47 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <27bd2360-1954-ecdf-8ffc-e21cafb41f6f@apache.org>
X-Original-References <CAPOrs_2CgGWYHHaTfWQu2m9-CT1G7mkj8urrBU7SOO5NVjut0A@mail.gmail.com> <2987ea94-ee49-aa93-e561-b0f126f95b12@debian.org> <CAPOrs_3NGpPhddHisGF_yMOHV+YvC9K0V2edo_a4=Rp-Rg875g@mail.gmail.com> <83b2d9c2-aad1-82c0-17b9-3571d350c978@debian.org> <CAPOrs_3i77KbifjLAaD1Go5T6OJG3b2h7obPg+GdTyJU+hgENg@mail.gmail.com> <5b892ff0-305c-5b38-915d-cabd545f4764@debian.org> <CAPOrs_1h=pwB6iUBVkw_CgsH-=DkBL=158cOec_eci08agmUrw@mail.gmail.com> <7287d657-8a2b-90dc-c2f4-093d0e148748@debian.org> <CAPOrs_2ch-hBnX8okoZf61cTAqHWN6n6Kzbn5VLToqW9OWTU5g@mail.gmail.com> <de8e111d-3cfb-e73d-e11c-6a72d360e228@debian.org> <CAPOrs_11jyLYv1_YFxnzG3--26faYBT=ZhNrPKrVvEQHsYA8JA@mail.gmail.com> <6e38b9de-89d6-71f5-aac6-0da36446c5cc@debian.org> <CAPOrs_3787t3+sDTAZk4ZUqcJJUL_H0AbSFPKJ7cBV_S+oU6Ug@mail.gmail.com> <59d87384-b94e-f662-716f-6b318b30d7fa@debian.org> <8bf889ad-bd99-8f82-46d0-fbe9d3d8b937@debian.org> <46b693cb-5a53-4fd6-9cc9-ed2f51f045bd@apache.org> <0925bc7a-0dd0-350f-af8d-e7ffb580916c@debian.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:10050

Show key headers only | View raw


Le 2/10/2017 à 17:51, Markus Koschany a écrit :

> There is at least one major downside of the current behavior. You
> completely loose the flexibility to choose that your package is able to
> run with an older version of libfoo. There is always a strict dependency
> on the latest version which can be a real hassle if you try to backport
> packages. Unfortunately we don't have a C/C++ mechanism like symbols
> files in Java but the answer should not be to enforce a dependency on
> the latest version.

Ideally the version used for the resolved dependencies should be the
ones defined in the pom, such that the packages express the same
requirements than the Maven artifacts they contain. That would be a less
strict middle ground.

Regarding the backports, what the current maven-debian-helper behavior
really limits is the ability to download a .deb built for sid and
install it directly in stable. Rebuilding the package for stable is
still possible with no extra modification, and the resolved dependencies
will then refer to the versions in stable.

Emmanuel Bourg

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

wanting to join the java team Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 16:50 +0200
  Re: wanting to join the java team Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-07-10 17:50 +0200
    Re: wanting to join the java team Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 19:00 +0200
      Re: wanting to join the java team Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-07-13 22:00 +0200
        Re: wanting to join the java team Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2017-07-14 10:00 +0200
        Re: wanting to join the java team Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 18:00 +0200
          Re: wanting to join the java team Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-07-14 20:20 +0200
            Re: wanting to join the java team Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 22:30 +0200
              Re: wanting to join the java team Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-07-16 23:50 +0200
                Re: wanting to join the java team Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 18:00 +0200
                Re: wanting to join the java team Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-07-27 18:00 +0200
                Re: wanting to join the java team Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-07-29 17:00 +0200
                Re: wanting to join the java team Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-07-29 17:10 +0200
                Re: wanting to join the java team Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 13:50 +0200
                Re: wanting to join the java team Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-09-28 18:00 +0200
                Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 01:30 +0200
                Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-02 23:00 +0200
                Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-03 19:40 +0200
                Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-02 23:20 +0200
                Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 23:50 +0200
                Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-10-03 17:40 +0200
                Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-03 19:20 +0200
                Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-10-04 17:50 +0200
                Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-04 19:20 +0200
                Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-10-05 13:10 +0200
                Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-05 14:40 +0200

csiph-web