Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #10060
| From | Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java |
| Date | 2017-10-03 19:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uwzkJ-3JF-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (12 earlier) <uuJoe-2om-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <uvVQm-8jo-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uwfYL-zn-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <uwfYL-zn-43@gated-at.bofh.it> <uwfYL-zn-39@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | debian.org |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Am 02.10.2017 um 18:35 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Le 2/10/2017 à 17:51, Markus Koschany a écrit : > >> There is at least one major downside of the current behavior. You >> completely loose the flexibility to choose that your package is able to >> run with an older version of libfoo. There is always a strict dependency >> on the latest version which can be a real hassle if you try to backport >> packages. Unfortunately we don't have a C/C++ mechanism like symbols >> files in Java but the answer should not be to enforce a dependency on >> the latest version. > > Ideally the version used for the resolved dependencies should be the > ones defined in the pom, such that the packages express the same > requirements than the Maven artifacts they contain. That would be a less > strict middle ground. In my opinion this should have been a new option where users can choose to opt-in. I find it less than optimal that the behavior of an existing option was changed without further notice and documentation and now everyone is expected to cope with the situation. > Regarding the backports, what the current maven-debian-helper behavior > really limits is the ability to download a .deb built for sid and > install it directly in stable. That would be an interesting feature but I think it is unrelated to the problem at hand. Rebuilding the package for stable is > still possible with no extra modification, and the resolved dependencies > will then refer to the versions in stable. Ok, this is true. But the dependency will be >= the latest version in backports or stable. This makes it more complicated to use customized packages. In the end the user is forced to override the strict dependency in debian/control if he prefers to use an earlier package version. Markus
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
wanting to join the java team Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 16:50 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-07-10 17:50 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 19:00 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-07-13 22:00 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2017-07-14 10:00 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 18:00 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-07-14 20:20 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 22:30 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-07-16 23:50 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 18:00 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-07-27 18:00 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-07-29 17:00 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-07-29 17:10 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 13:50 +0200
Re: wanting to join the java team Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-09-28 18:00 +0200
Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 01:30 +0200
Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-02 23:00 +0200
Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-03 19:40 +0200
Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-02 23:20 +0200
Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 23:50 +0200
Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-10-03 17:40 +0200
Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-03 19:20 +0200
Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-10-04 17:50 +0200
Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-04 19:20 +0200
Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Carnë Draug <carandraug+dev@gmail.com> - 2017-10-05 13:10 +0200
Re: Review of fairsim, libjtransforms-java and libjlargearray-java Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-05 14:40 +0200
csiph-web