Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8404
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails |
| Date | Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:30:03 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qeqyn-7BV-41@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qe4et-Oh-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe4ob-ZN-57@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe5kf-2lV-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <qemXM-2nj-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <qenqO-3b6-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeoGe-4Tw-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeqf1-7dN-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeqoI-7qA-67@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-java@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Wed Sep 30 14:28:23 2015 |
| Old-Return-Path | <apo@gambaru.de> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-12.6 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -6.1 |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eEq140JAWL70SabPu0wEHvSiXGeh92W8r" |
| X-Sa-Exim-Scanned | No (on richard.fcube.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18718 |
| List-ID | <debian-java.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/560BF176.1020104@gambaru.de |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 52 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Cc | Reproducible Builds discussion list <reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org> |
| X-Original-Date | Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:28:06 +0200 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <560BF176.1020104@gambaru.de> |
| X-Original-References | <20150928230515.CADF11ED52@jenkins.debian.net> <560AA4A5.5080400@apache.org> <560AB150.9060104@gambaru.de> <201509301230.35830.holger@layer-acht.org> <560BC0E2.8090500@gambaru.de> <560BD526.80304@apache.org> <20150930141340.GA8990@alice.nomadium.lan> <20150930141531.GA23045@chase.mapreri.org> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8404 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Am 30.09.2015 um 16:15 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo: [...] > This wouldn't work with the current implementation, which is emailing > $pkg@packages.debian.org. Anyway, I received a suggestion of setting up > a new PTS keyword, so then people can go and subscribe there, maybe > using the team facility of the new tracker to subscribe to the whole lot > (i beliebe it works that way?). This is what I had in mind too. I would prefer such an implementation over the current state. Just let interested people (humans) subscribe to this feature with their private e-mail address. I still think that DDPO is sufficient but if the others feel we need the same information via e-mail then I would prefer only FTBFS reports in unstable. Markus
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-29 16:40 +0200
Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-29 16:50 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-29 17:10 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-29 17:30 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-10-03 03:00 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-10-05 12:50 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-10-05 13:10 +0200
Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-29 17:50 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-30 12:40 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-30 13:10 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-30 14:30 +0200
Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 16:10 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@mapreri.org> - 2015-09-30 16:20 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-30 16:30 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-29 17:20 +0200
csiph-web