Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8403

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@mapreri.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails
Date Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:20:04 +0200
Message-ID <qeqoI-7qA-67@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qe4et-Oh-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe4ob-ZN-57@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe5kf-2lV-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <qemXM-2nj-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <qenqO-3b6-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeoGe-4Tw-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeqf1-7dN-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Reproducible Builds discussion list <reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Wed Sep 30 14:15:57 2015
Old-Return-Path <mapreri@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-12.4 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.198, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate:hard: -7
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=GnAK/Rz2hXg+TkAYzmptXZfOAG1hH91w+704rwbyi44=; b=N4haSOHcCmzEfqLJ4unss5XVS5W3eCE2BZ4Y2/LEsFkPYYnMfPiVJkGhPFCmBVWXbt /U9EBmS0vB6gAN+MElAPLGuDJoaRbXZC317jTjGnf6+PlAiAAacrXVSiog2AzSBS4PBj gvmdVN9iYHrVfwGmt1WCUqHncoI2waEAkoVqSoBSBWfYb+DZqlOH+VEiaa/He4li4m5D 81jtIOGJ34eZ01yd7cnoyFWBKyv1op/XfBy6JRLS3RCi5e/5I65VEASbt0ky37xeL406 lFkmPMUABng50UnmmZKOUWi5q72LMeblTLspfb884p+Onkw5f4xBV/Q6xD97CohMU4Jh sGag==
X-Received by 10.194.113.33 with SMTP id iv1mr4360328wjb.65.1443622535140; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 07:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7"
Content-Disposition inline
X-Info Keep It Simple, Stupid.
X-Operating-System Linux, kernel 4.2.0-1-amd64, inside Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid) sid.
X-Message-Flag WARNING!! Outlook sucks. A lot.
User-Agent Every email client sucks, this one just sucks less.
X-Mailing-List <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18717
List-ID <debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20150930141531.GA23045@chase.mapreri.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 60
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Cc debian-java@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Wed, 30 Sep 2015 14:15:31 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID <20150930141531.GA23045@chase.mapreri.org>
X-Original-References <20150928230515.CADF11ED52@jenkins.debian.net> <560AA4A5.5080400@apache.org> <560AB150.9060104@gambaru.de> <201509301230.35830.holger@layer-acht.org> <560BC0E2.8090500@gambaru.de> <560BD526.80304@apache.org> <20150930141340.GA8990@alice.nomadium.lan>
X-Original-Sender Mattia Rizzolo <mapreri@gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8403

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:13:40AM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 02:27:18PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > 
> > Markus (and the others), do you think it's ok to keep the notifications
> > if they are limited to unstable ? Or would you prefer disabling them
> > completely until the build environment stabilizes?
> 
> I think there is value in receiving these notifications, they provide
> timely feedback about the status of our packages.
> 
> Maybe we can setup a mailing list for this, something like
> pkg-java-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org? (we already have
> pkg-java-commits, for example).

This wouldn't work with the current implementation, which is emailing
$pkg@packages.debian.org.  Anyway, I received a suggestion of setting up
a new PTS keyword, so then people can go and subscribe there, maybe
using the team facility of the new tracker to subscribe to the whole lot
(i beliebe it works that way?).

Does anybody knows how to achive that?


-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  http://mapreri.org                              : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-29 16:40 +0200
  Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-29 16:50 +0200
    Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-29 17:10 +0200
      Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-29 17:30 +0200
        Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-10-03 03:00 +0200
          Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-10-05 12:50 +0200
            Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-10-05 13:10 +0200
    Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-29 17:50 +0200
      Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-30 12:40 +0200
        Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-30 13:10 +0200
          Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-30 14:30 +0200
            Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 16:10 +0200
              Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@mapreri.org> - 2015-09-30 16:20 +0200
                Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-30 16:30 +0200
  Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-29 17:20 +0200

csiph-web