Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8401

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.java
Subject	Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails
Date	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 14:30:02 +0200
Message-ID	<qeoGe-4Tw-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qe4et-Oh-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe4ob-ZN-57@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe5kf-2lV-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <qemXM-2nj-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <qenqO-3b6-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org, "debian-java@lists.debian.org" <debian-java@lists.debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Wed Sep 30 12:27:39 2015
Old-Return-Path	<emmanuel.bourg@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.5 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.198, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -7
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cJyMeyFPSq70aqBBj1JP0gsVaKoeeJomzeGjdsOyOEw=; b=MogF82YKGVTr+0lTtqgZ06sb6KD6duDa4+Q6m/EWxieNuJh7pheWqWgIRv8j/R9okJ zeWXmmFBQJIs86wrQvEo2EQpP7tWevoqQDsvi3v5MP9cFQerp8xCC7ioAZ+Wgnm02U8G CJxlPQVMb8Z7dyeiZJlOJNViJmW9ZRhErUQ0PL4qvlfBTv6XuyMpUl2T1O3f/p2Z0EvU YOHk4ccIwYhCGLAZXcLJ1jUgZkLqOpRkhIFwfruZWvf+nhgx+cdYdEEZtr8ZCK7WKH92 XcRTRV+xjDVhVdxxyJkZxaQV6DdOdGLRWU0HN0P8G7jBc+SUGJCieRlR3mjyASYzBE+0 yu3Q==
X-Received	by 10.194.104.200 with SMTP id gg8mr4329854wjb.144.1443616040069; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 05:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status	N1110
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Mailing-List	<debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18715
List-ID	<debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/560BD526.80304@apache.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	13
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Date	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 14:27:18 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID	<560BD526.80304@apache.org>
X-Original-References	<20150928230515.CADF11ED52@jenkins.debian.net> <560AA4A5.5080400@apache.org> <560AB150.9060104@gambaru.de> <201509301230.35830.holger@layer-acht.org> <560BC0E2.8090500@gambaru.de>
X-Original-Sender	Emmanuel Bourg <emmanuel.bourg@gmail.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8401

Show key headers only | View raw

Le 30/09/2015 13:00, Markus Koschany a écrit :

> We have never discussed this before as a team. I vote for unsubscribing
> pkg-java because of the issues that were pointed out already.

I did request the notifications for the team, but I didn't really expect
so many false positives. Sorry for the trouble.

Markus (and the others), do you think it's ok to keep the notifications
if they are limited to unstable ? Or would you prefer disabling them
completely until the build environment stabilizes?

Emmanuel Bourg

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-29 16:40 +0200
  Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-29 16:50 +0200
    Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-29 17:10 +0200
      Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-29 17:30 +0200
        Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-10-03 03:00 +0200
          Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-10-05 12:50 +0200
            Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-10-05 13:10 +0200
    Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-29 17:50 +0200
      Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-30 12:40 +0200
        Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-30 13:10 +0200
          Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-30 14:30 +0200
            Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 16:10 +0200
              Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@mapreri.org> - 2015-09-30 16:20 +0200
                Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-30 16:30 +0200
  Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-29 17:20 +0200

csiph-web