Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8395

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails

Path	csiph.com!au2pb.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.albasani.net!tahina.priv.at!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.java
Subject	Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails
Date	Tue, 29 Sep 2015 17:30:05 +0200
Message-ID	<qe50V-1Za-85@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qe4et-Oh-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe4et-Oh-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe4ob-ZN-57@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe4Hw-1BQ-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org, "debian-java@lists.debian.org" <debian-java@lists.debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Tue Sep 29 15:20:43 2015
Old-Return-Path	<emmanuel.bourg@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.5 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.198, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -7
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qJz4M6gDMrPqbNX2nA3U04wAChauLdUAHO7eaNuSit8=; b=d6oT6eWfUtpAOOgKfIfV+VgWzqPit/fvoaZUcVWdOzndONJsWbgPyOl+bUMXOE7cF0 bjbx6XA7d9RIkxzO7CFgtDldn1C08XX72J+QlytBq0/uNS/VBI3qQPvJiOqBujGrC51R 4w3MZXfwHMxKb+k2mMr+tAKdIQaHoVr9/ao3M8dFbaQYTHrtfLMiDUchOAA4jFUp21a4 1WydyICMKBcbi2nrfoS4pAfSG+yY655kv1ntTlvyNwAA4WxDH7TAw8MxER9QfhBtG5ch 4zBjcrLfvs3atsS405PTgojbMgbcsYHxI9aEDisMOi2piaYR6hzT/OxwhynFaZOk9atd WxoA==
X-Received	by 10.180.90.229 with SMTP id bz5mr27515623wib.46.1443540025170; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 08:20:25 -0700 (PDT)
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status	N1110
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Mailing-List	<debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18709
List-ID	<debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/560AAC37.8080104@apache.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	13
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Date	Tue, 29 Sep 2015 17:20:23 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID	<560AAC37.8080104@apache.org>
X-Original-References	<20150928230515.CADF11ED52@jenkins.debian.net> <560AA10C.2080402@gambaru.de> <560AA4A5.5080400@apache.org> <201509291708.21156.holger@layer-acht.org>
X-Original-Sender	Emmanuel Bourg <emmanuel.bourg@gmail.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8395

Show key headers only | View raw

Le 29/09/2015 17:08, Holger Levsen a écrit :

> I agree and am wondering if we should actually do this, and limit (maintainer) 
> notifications to unstable? What do you think?

Well, if I understood your "this graph is a lie" properly in your talks,
I think the reproducibility in testing isn't very interesting for now,
until the tool chain matures and we have really reproducible packages in
unstable. At this point the testing notifications will have much more sense.

So yes, limiting maintainer notifications to unstable would be a good idea.

Emmanuel Bourg

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-29 16:40 +0200
  Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-29 16:50 +0200
    Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-29 17:10 +0200
      Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-29 17:30 +0200
        Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-10-03 03:00 +0200
          Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-10-05 12:50 +0200
            Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-10-05 13:10 +0200
    Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-29 17:50 +0200
      Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-30 12:40 +0200
        Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-30 13:10 +0200
          Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-30 14:30 +0200
            Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 16:10 +0200
              Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@mapreri.org> - 2015-09-30 16:20 +0200
                Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-30 16:30 +0200
  Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-29 17:20 +0200

csiph-web