Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8293

Re: Azureus

Path	csiph.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.java
Subject	Re: Azureus
Date	Fri, 28 Aug 2015 22:40:02 +0200
Message-ID	<q2yBk-5Er-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<pWNMJ-2tG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pYA8G-2u0-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <pYLx8-2dp-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <pZEad-6lY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <q2yhY-5kj-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	debian-java@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Fri Aug 28 20:30:44 2015
Old-Return-Path	<apo@gambaru.de>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-10.6 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, ONEWORD=2, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	DYN_NJABL=SKIP(0) NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 BL_NJABL=SKIP(-1.5) CL_IP_EQ_FROM_MX=-3.1; rate: -6.1
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a35DPcPr5p6NOBCNx3kTA34m0BHrxDHGw"
X-Sa-Exim-Scanned	No (on richard.fcube.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Mailing-List	<debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18605
List-ID	<debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/55E0C4E0.60902@gambaru.de
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	48
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Fri, 28 Aug 2015 22:30:24 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID	<55E0C4E0.60902@gambaru.de>
X-Original-References	<CAHpHs3m5CFK_gV_LF6_1OArpcdvxcQ38mX5zrW6zB=dR-2PPAQ@mail.gmail.com> <55D25120.5020400@gambaru.de> <CAHpHs3=Ni5mzzTs-QEcFWc0ORmzDVBaXbottq6WXnxEVQTQR3w@mail.gmail.com> <55D6301B.6070509@gambaru.de> <CAHpHs3nhSsx4dVW6Si1TefX0FhAxWM+VA5LWeex2-8dPQKjdCw@mail.gmail.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8293

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Am 28.08.2015 um 22:16 schrieb Stephen Nelson:
[...]
> 
> For the code to be compliant with DFSG does each one need a valid
> header, or is a statement from upstream sufficient? I also noticed a
> lot of image files used in Azureus and was not sure of their licence
> so I have asked about those too.

A statement from upstream is sufficient. There is no DFSG requirement
that all files must carry a license header as long as there is another
source to clarify the license status. (README, LICENSE file, etc.)

Markus

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Azureus Stephen Nelson <stephen@eccostudio.com> - 2015-08-13 01:40 +0200
  Re: Azureus Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-08-17 23:30 +0200
    Re: Azureus Stephen Nelson <stephen@eccostudio.com> - 2015-08-18 11:40 +0200
      Re: Azureus Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-08-20 22:00 +0200
        Re: Azureus Stephen Nelson <stephen@eccostudio.com> - 2015-08-28 22:20 +0200
          Re: Azureus Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-08-28 22:40 +0200
  Re: Azureus Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-08-18 00:20 +0200
    Re: Azureus Stephen Nelson <stephen@eccostudio.com> - 2015-08-18 11:50 +0200
  Re: Azureus tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2015-08-18 04:40 +0200
    Re: Azureus Stephen Nelson <stephen@eccostudio.com> - 2015-08-18 11:50 +0200

csiph-web