Path: csiph.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java
Subject: Re: Azureus
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 22:40:02 +0200
Message-ID: <q2yBk-5Er-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <pWNMJ-2tG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pYA8G-2u0-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <pYLx8-2dp-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <pZEad-6lY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <q2yhY-5kj-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To: debian-java@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org  Fri Aug 28 20:30:44 2015
Old-Return-Path: <apo@gambaru.de>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, ONEWORD=2, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight: DYN_NJABL=SKIP(0) NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 BL_NJABL=SKIP(-1.5) CL_IP_EQ_FROM_MX=-3.1; rate: -6.1
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a35DPcPr5p6NOBCNx3kTA34m0BHrxDHGw"
X-Sa-Exim-Scanned: No (on richard.fcube.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Mailing-List: <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18605
List-ID: <debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL: <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/55E0C4E0.60902@gambaru.de
Approved: robomod@news.nic.it
Lines: 48
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 22:30:24 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID: <55E0C4E0.60902@gambaru.de>
X-Original-References: <CAHpHs3m5CFK_gV_LF6_1OArpcdvxcQ38mX5zrW6zB=dR-2PPAQ@mail.gmail.com>	<55D25120.5020400@gambaru.de>	<CAHpHs3=Ni5mzzTs-QEcFWc0ORmzDVBaXbottq6WXnxEVQTQR3w@mail.gmail.com>	<55D6301B.6070509@gambaru.de> <CAHpHs3nhSsx4dVW6Si1TefX0FhAxWM+VA5LWeex2-8dPQKjdCw@mail.gmail.com>
Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8293

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--a35DPcPr5p6NOBCNx3kTA34m0BHrxDHGw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Am 28.08.2015 um 22:16 schrieb Stephen Nelson:
[...]
>=20
> For the code to be compliant with DFSG does each one need a valid
> header, or is a statement from upstream sufficient? I also noticed a
> lot of image files used in Azureus and was not sure of their licence
> so I have asked about those too.

A statement from upstream is sufficient. There is no DFSG requirement
that all files must carry a license header as long as there is another
source to clarify the license status. (README, LICENSE file, etc.)

Markus




--a35DPcPr5p6NOBCNx3kTA34m0BHrxDHGw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=FcDv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--a35DPcPr5p6NOBCNx3kTA34m0BHrxDHGw--