Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8293

Re: Azureus

From	Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.java
Subject	Re: Azureus
Date	2015-08-28 22:40 +0200
Message-ID	<q2yBk-5Er-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<pWNMJ-2tG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pYA8G-2u0-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <pYLx8-2dp-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <pZEad-6lY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <q2yhY-5kj-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Am 28.08.2015 um 22:16 schrieb Stephen Nelson:
[...]
> 
> For the code to be compliant with DFSG does each one need a valid
> header, or is a statement from upstream sufficient? I also noticed a
> lot of image files used in Azureus and was not sure of their licence
> so I have asked about those too.

A statement from upstream is sufficient. There is no DFSG requirement
that all files must carry a license header as long as there is another
source to clarify the license status. (README, LICENSE file, etc.)

Markus

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Azureus Stephen Nelson <stephen@eccostudio.com> - 2015-08-13 01:40 +0200
  Re: Azureus Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-08-17 23:30 +0200
    Re: Azureus Stephen Nelson <stephen@eccostudio.com> - 2015-08-18 11:40 +0200
      Re: Azureus Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-08-20 22:00 +0200
        Re: Azureus Stephen Nelson <stephen@eccostudio.com> - 2015-08-28 22:20 +0200
          Re: Azureus Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-08-28 22:40 +0200
  Re: Azureus Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-08-18 00:20 +0200
    Re: Azureus Stephen Nelson <stephen@eccostudio.com> - 2015-08-18 11:50 +0200
  Re: Azureus tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2015-08-18 04:40 +0200
    Re: Azureus Stephen Nelson <stephen@eccostudio.com> - 2015-08-18 11:50 +0200

csiph-web