Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12562
| From | Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? |
| Date | 2023-02-13 17:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FYJpf-5ADp-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <FUjtn-2EmF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <FUm7T-2G7u-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FYFlE-5y7K-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <FYHGO-5zJi-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <FYJ5U-5Avk-53@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | @||@ |
Hans-Christoph Steiner: > > > Thorsten Glaser: >> On Mon, 13 Feb 2023, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> >>> Great work there! I would still love to see openjdk-8 in bookworm. >> >> That ship has sailed yesterday. No new entries into testing are now >> possible any more. > > Damn, that might mean a lot of Android packages are not going to be in bookworm. > We're in a very similar boat as Kotlin/Gradle, with upstream still building > things with JDK8. We have piles of time-consuming hacks to keep things going. > >>> We're >>> going to loose a bunch of Android things because doclava cannot run newer JDKs. >>> Upstream still uses JDK8 to build it in the current Android code. >> >> You mean you lost these after stretch when openjdk-8 was not shipped >> with buster any more, of course. > > android-framework-23 is in bullseye. So I doublechecked, it is actually just a > conflict with JDK17, due to the removal of com.sun.javadoc, which was deprecated > in JDK11. JDK8 would cover that though. > > I have no idea how much work it'd be to port to the new API > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011567 > > .hc > I dug a bit more: yes, some Android packages will not be in bookworm, but looks like the most important ones will not be affected by android-framework-23 being removed. I think some of the other team members reduced the reliance on that package recently, which I wasn't aware of. .hc
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-01-26 18:20 +0100
Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2023-01-26 19:10 +0100
Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-01-26 19:40 +0100
Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-01-30 00:40 +0100
Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-01-30 00:50 +0100
Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-02-10 18:10 +0100
Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-02-11 10:30 +0100
Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-02-01 12:30 +0100
Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2023-02-01 15:20 +0100
Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> - 2023-02-13 12:40 +0100
Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-02-13 15:10 +0100
Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> - 2023-02-13 16:40 +0100
Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> - 2023-02-13 17:00 +0100
Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-02-13 17:20 +0100
Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> - 2023-02-13 17:40 +0100
csiph-web