Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12562

Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm?

From Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm?
Date 2023-02-13 17:00 +0100
Message-ID <FYJpf-5ADp-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <FUjtn-2EmF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <FUm7T-2G7u-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FYFlE-5y7K-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <FYHGO-5zJi-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <FYJ5U-5Avk-53@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization @||@

Show all headers | View raw


Hans-Christoph Steiner:
> 
> 
> Thorsten Glaser:
>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2023, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>>> Great work there!  I would still love to see openjdk-8 in bookworm.
>>
>> That ship has sailed yesterday. No new entries into testing are now
>> possible any more.
> 
> Damn, that might mean a lot of Android packages are not going to be in bookworm. 
>   We're in a very similar boat as Kotlin/Gradle, with upstream still building 
> things with JDK8.  We have piles of time-consuming hacks to keep things going.
> 
>>> We're
>>> going to loose a bunch of Android things because doclava cannot run newer JDKs.
>>> Upstream still uses JDK8 to build it in the current Android code.
>>
>> You mean you lost these after stretch when openjdk-8 was not shipped
>> with buster any more, of course.
> 
> android-framework-23 is in bullseye.  So I doublechecked, it is actually just a 
> conflict with JDK17, due to the removal of com.sun.javadoc, which was deprecated 
> in JDK11.  JDK8 would cover that though.
> 
> I have no idea how much work it'd be to port to the new API
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011567
> 
> .hc
> 

I dug a bit more: yes, some Android packages will not be in bookworm, but looks 
like the most important ones will not be affected by android-framework-23 being 
removed.  I think some of the other team members reduced the reliance on that 
package recently, which I wasn't aware of.

.hc

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-01-26 18:20 +0100
  Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2023-01-26 19:10 +0100
  Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-01-26 19:40 +0100
    Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-01-30 00:40 +0100
      Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-01-30 00:50 +0100
        Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-02-10 18:10 +0100
          Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-02-11 10:30 +0100
  Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-02-01 12:30 +0100
    Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2023-02-01 15:20 +0100
      Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> - 2023-02-13 12:40 +0100
        Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-02-13 15:10 +0100
          Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> - 2023-02-13 16:40 +0100
            Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> - 2023-02-13 17:00 +0100
            Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-02-13 17:20 +0100
              Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm? Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> - 2023-02-13 17:40 +0100

csiph-web