Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12551
| From | Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: help with plugin versions and maven-debian-helper |
| Date | 2023-02-10 16:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FXDFf-4SEo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <FXjZU-4GiL-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <FXnh7-4Irm-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <FXpVD-4JNE-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <FXAem-4Qo0-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <FXCg9-4RTP-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Le 2023-02-10 15:01, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : > DevRef §6.7.8.2 indicates that using such a suffix for *all* repacked > origtgz is better. Almost all our packages are repacked, that's pointless and brings no useful information. https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.en.html#repackaged-upstream-source "may use packagename-upstream-version+dfsg (or any other suffix which is added to the tarball name) as the name of the top-level directory in its tarball. This makes it possible to distinguish pristine tarballs from repackaged ones." The 'may' requirement for the suffix is very weak. The Lintian repackaged-source-not-advertised warning should be downgraded to pedantic. Our time is limited, let's focus on important things. Emmanuel Bourg
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
help with plugin versions and maven-debian-helper Joe Nahmias <joe@nahmias.net> - 2023-02-08 05:50 +0100
Re: help with plugin versions and maven-debian-helper Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-02-08 09:00 +0100
Re: help with plugin versions and maven-debian-helper Joe Nahmias <joe@nahmias.net> - 2023-02-09 00:10 +0100
Re: help with plugin versions and maven-debian-helper Joe Nahmias <joe@nahmias.net> - 2023-02-09 00:30 +0100
Re: help with plugin versions and maven-debian-helper Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-02-09 08:40 +0100
Re: help with plugin versions and maven-debian-helper Joe Nahmias <joe@nahmias.net> - 2023-02-09 19:40 +0100
Re: help with plugin versions and maven-debian-helper Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-02-09 23:10 +0100
Re: help with plugin versions and maven-debian-helper Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-02-09 23:20 +0100
Re: help with plugin versions and maven-debian-helper Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-02-09 23:30 +0100
Re: help with plugin versions and maven-debian-helper Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-02-09 23:20 +0100
Re: help with plugin versions and maven-debian-helper Joe Nahmias <joe@nahmias.net> - 2023-02-10 02:00 +0100
Re: help with plugin versions and maven-debian-helper Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-02-10 13:00 +0100
Re: help with plugin versions and maven-debian-helper Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-02-10 15:10 +0100
Re: help with plugin versions and maven-debian-helper Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-02-10 16:40 +0100
csiph-web