Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Emmanuel Bourg Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: help with plugin versions and maven-debian-helper Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 16:40:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Thorsten Glaser X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Fri Feb 10 15:33:47 2023 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .apache. - helo: .9.mo581.mail-out.ovh. - helo-domain: .ovh.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=0; rate: -3.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.13 X-Sender: ebourg@apache.org X-Originating-IP: 78.197.213.85 X-Webmail-Userid: ebourg-oss@ariane-software.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Ovh-Tracer-ID: 7070651415236638778 X-Vr-Spamstate: OK X-Vr-Spamscore: -100 X-Vr-Spamcause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudehhedgjeegucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfdpvefjgfevmfevgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecuhedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepggffhffvvefujghffgfkgihitgfgsehtkehjtddtreejnecuhfhrohhmpefgmhhmrghnuhgvlhcuuehouhhrghcuoegvsghouhhrghesrghprggthhgvrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeelvdfhgeevgedtudektedujeeffedvtddujeekffdtjeeivddvhfeuvdekkeevgeenucffohhmrghinhepuggvsghirghnrdhorhhgnecukfhppeduvdejrddtrddtrddupdejkedrudeljedrvddufedrkeehpddujeeirdefuddrvdefhedrkedunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepuddvjedrtddrtddruddpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeeovggsohhurhhgsegrphgrtghhvgdrohhrgheqpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedupdhrtghpthhtohepuggvsghirghnqdhjrghvrgeslhhishhtshdruggvsghirghnrdhorhhgpdfovfetjfhoshhtpehmohehkedupdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuth X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/23202 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/389ccb92b64c545ac07f6730fb6c779b@apache.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 22 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org, Joe Nahmias X-Original-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 16:26:23 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <389ccb92b64c545ac07f6730fb6c779b@apache.org> X-Original-References: <5727dc243076178631326e380aa5ac10@apache.org> <775eae911ef06536b5f24424e4c91ae2@apache.org> <6144a66b-712e-b520-554e-c7f51fc53c67@tarent.de> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12551 Le 2023-02-10 15:01, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : > DevRef §6.7.8.2 indicates that using such a suffix for *all* repacked > origtgz is better. Almost all our packages are repacked, that's pointless and brings no useful information. https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.en.html#repackaged-upstream-source "may use packagename-upstream-version+dfsg (or any other suffix which is added to the tarball name) as the name of the top-level directory in its tarball. This makes it possible to distinguish pristine tarballs from repackaged ones." The 'may' requirement for the suffix is very weak. The Lintian repackaged-source-not-advertised warning should be downgraded to pedantic. Our time is limited, let's focus on important things. Emmanuel Bourg