Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12421

Bug#975016: #975016 - OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Bug#975016: #975016 - OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye
Date Thu, 18 Aug 2022 19:10:01 +0200
Message-ID <EVRbP-1rDb-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <BFEyS-60u-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <BFPXj-55G-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DMKY9-3Hn-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <BchkK-5v4-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <DMLUe-4fT-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <DPeS5-PWd-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <DPQ1j-1cEw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <EVoMx-1agb-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <BchkK-5v4-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <EVx3r-1ff4-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <BchkK-5v4-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <EVx3r-1ff4-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Thu Aug 18 17:06:10 2022
Old-Return-Path <debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org>
X-Spam-Flag NO
X-Spam-Score -3.96
Reply-To Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>, 975016@bugs.debian.org
Resent-To debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-Cc Debian Security Team <team@security.debian.org>,
X-Debian-Pr-Message followup 975016
X-Debian-Pr-Package debian-security-support
X-Debian-Pr-Keywords moreinfo
X-Debian-Pr-Source debian-security-support
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MYvgJXaY/hzcwTAZ"
Content-Disposition inline
X-Debian-Message from BTS
X-Mailing-List <debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/1729921
List-ID <debian-bugs-dist.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-bugs-dist/>
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 62
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>, Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>, Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de>, Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>, debian-java@lists.debian.org, security <security@debian.org>
X-Original-Date Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:03:17 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID <Yv5w1Zikvjh6cD+T@layer-acht.org>
X-Original-References <3e72c4fc-9ad4-5ba2-c194-e2449d1d3d75@apache.org> <28df3e43-5ca2-9647-b883-9b53c2d30ec4@debian.org> <YfvgRRJUf20PrJ6p@layer-acht.org> <160565089338.4090.11133710586870120280.reportbug@hullmann.westfalen.local> <cbd2943a-6921-5a6-532f-7d975a14217b@tarent.de> <YgToaExntWjCwSMu@pisco.westfalen.local> <617423da-cf95-e75d-b4f1-c8b81ceb691b@debian.org> <YvzHPbxCt6b9GhLy@layer-acht.org> <160565089338.4090.11133710586870120280.reportbug@hullmann.westfalen.local> <Yv1Ds9qyrEHbzc6l@eldamar.lan> <160565089338.4090.11133710586870120280.reportbug@hullmann.westfalen.local> <Yv1Ds9qyrEHbzc6l@eldamar.lan>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1113580 linux.debian.maint.java:12421

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi Carnil,

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 09:38:27PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Sort of. Just for exanding the context, there is a note about it in
> https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#limited-security-support

thanks, I've added openjdk-17 to security-support-limited now and used
https://www.debian.org/releases/bullseye/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#openjdk-17
as a link/reason why.

I've done this for the master and bullseye branch and intend to get
this into the next point release.

btw, it would be great if there were 
https://www.debian.org/releases/bookworm/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html
already as that would be more appropriate for unstable right now.


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
 ⠈⠳⣄

"I became an antifascist out of a sense of common decency.” – Marlene Dietrich

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

OpenJDK 17 for bullseye-backports Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2021-02-02 19:30 +0100
  Re: OpenJDK 17 for bullseye-backports Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2021-02-06 23:50 +0100
    Re: OpenJDK 17 for bullseye-backports Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2021-02-07 00:50 +0100
      Re: OpenJDK 17 for bullseye-backports Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2021-02-07 11:10 +0100
    Re: OpenJDK 17 for bullseye-backports Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2021-02-07 12:10 +0100
      Re: #975016 -  OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2022-02-03 15:10 +0100
        Re: #975016 -  OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-02-03 16:10 +0100
          Bug#975016: #975016 -  OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2022-02-10 11:40 +0100
            Bug#975016: #975016 - OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2022-02-12 03:10 +0100
              Bug#975016: #975016 - OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-08-17 21:40 +0200
                Bug#975016: #975016 - OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2022-08-18 19:10 +0200

csiph-web