Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12346

Bug#975016: #975016 - OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye

From	Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.maint.java, linux.debian.devel.release
Subject	Bug#975016: #975016 - OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye
Date	2022-02-12 03:10 +0100
Message-ID	<DPQ1j-1cEw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <BchkK-5v4-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <DMLUe-4fT-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <DPeS5-PWd-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <BchkK-5v4-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <DPeS5-PWd-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/10/22 11:26, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Am Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 03:59:00PM +0100 schrieb Thorsten Glaser:
>> Hi Holger,
>>
>>> and filed against src:debian-security-support, as openjdk-17 seems to be
>>> supported and src:debian-security-support's purpose is to documented what's
>>
>> no, 11 is supported, 17 is just for users to run third-party
>> stuff on (IIUC).
> 
> In Bullseye 11 is the default Java and fully covered by security support.
> 
> 17 can be installed (and it can also take over the typical alternatives),
> but nothing pulls it in via dependencies. But if anyone needs to run an
> application requiring 17, this is the JRE of choice (those are rare at
> this point, but it will change over the life time of Bullseye).
> 
> And yes there have been security updates for 17 already, but it's a best effort
> thing. If someone commits to rebuild the openjdk-17 uploads to unstable
> for bullseye-security (along with proper testing), we can also omit a note
> for src:debian-security-support.

"along with proper testing" means, that we can turn on again the tests during
the build, which requires a heap of new upstream versions for jtreg, jtharness,
testng, groovy, and probably much more.

Matthias

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

OpenJDK 17 for bullseye-backports Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2021-02-02 19:30 +0100
  Re: OpenJDK 17 for bullseye-backports Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2021-02-06 23:50 +0100
    Re: OpenJDK 17 for bullseye-backports Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2021-02-07 00:50 +0100
      Re: OpenJDK 17 for bullseye-backports Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2021-02-07 11:10 +0100
    Re: OpenJDK 17 for bullseye-backports Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2021-02-07 12:10 +0100
      Re: #975016 -  OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2022-02-03 15:10 +0100
        Re: #975016 -  OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-02-03 16:10 +0100
          Bug#975016: #975016 -  OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2022-02-10 11:40 +0100
            Bug#975016: #975016 - OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2022-02-12 03:10 +0100
              Bug#975016: #975016 - OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-08-17 21:40 +0200
                Bug#975016: #975016 - OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2022-08-18 19:10 +0200

csiph-web