Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12343

Re: #975016 - OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye

From Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java, linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject Re: #975016 - OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye
Date 2022-02-03 15:10 +0100
Message-ID <DMKY9-3Hn-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <BE8B3-75e-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <BFEyS-60u-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <BFPXj-55G-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

hi,

almost exactly a year ago...

On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 11:59:23AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> So I'm going with option 1, preparing for an openjdk-17 in bullseye, and
> preparing release notes and notes for security support.  This is more
> conservative than option 2, but allows to do better than the commitment made.
> 
> The option also has the advantage that approval is only needed by the security
> team.  openjdk-17 already is in testing.  granting unblock requests for new
> snapshot builds by the release team would be appreciated, but isn't strictly
> necessary as long as we can build newer snapshots. And that can be checked in
> unstable.

so, as I see it, openjdk-17 is in bullseye and now I'm wondering what
I should do with  #975016 titled "OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye"
and filed against src:debian-security-support, as openjdk-17 seems to be
supported and src:debian-security-support's purpose is to documented what's
unsupported.

so, should I just close this bug?


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
 ⠈⠳⣄

A ship is always safe at shore, but that is not what it's built for.
(Albert Einstein)

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

OpenJDK 17 for bullseye-backports Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2021-02-02 19:30 +0100
  Re: OpenJDK 17 for bullseye-backports Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2021-02-06 23:50 +0100
    Re: OpenJDK 17 for bullseye-backports Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2021-02-07 00:50 +0100
      Re: OpenJDK 17 for bullseye-backports Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2021-02-07 11:10 +0100
    Re: OpenJDK 17 for bullseye-backports Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2021-02-07 12:10 +0100
      Re: #975016 -  OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2022-02-03 15:10 +0100
        Re: #975016 -  OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2022-02-03 16:10 +0100
          Bug#975016: #975016 -  OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2022-02-10 11:40 +0100
            Bug#975016: #975016 - OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2022-02-12 03:10 +0100
              Bug#975016: #975016 - OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-08-17 21:40 +0200
                Bug#975016: #975016 - OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2022-08-18 19:10 +0200

csiph-web