Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Holger Levsen Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java,linux.debian.devel.release,linux.debian.bugs.dist Subject: Re: #975016 - OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 15:10:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Matthias Klose X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Thu Feb 3 14:02:13 2022 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.441 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, SARE_MLH_Stock10=1.66] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vhFCHnfOgGuCMAFO" Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/22974 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/YfvgRRJUf20PrJ6p@layer-acht.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 70 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Emmanuel Bourg , Adrian Bunk , debian-java@lists.debian.org, ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org, debian-backports@lists.debian.org, 975016@bugs.debian.org, security X-Original-Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 14:01:41 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <20210202180412.GI23296@localhost> <3e72c4fc-9ad4-5ba2-c194-e2449d1d3d75@apache.org> <28df3e43-5ca2-9647-b883-9b53c2d30ec4@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12343 linux.debian.devel.release:107350 linux.debian.bugs.dist:1091927 --vhFCHnfOgGuCMAFO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hi, almost exactly a year ago... On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 11:59:23AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > So I'm going with option 1, preparing for an openjdk-17 in bullseye, and > preparing release notes and notes for security support. This is more > conservative than option 2, but allows to do better than the commitment m= ade. >=20 > The option also has the advantage that approval is only needed by the sec= urity > team. openjdk-17 already is in testing. granting unblock requests for n= ew > snapshot builds by the release team would be appreciated, but isn't stric= tly > necessary as long as we can build newer snapshots. And that can be checke= d in > unstable. so, as I see it, openjdk-17 is in bullseye and now I'm wondering what I should do with #975016 titled "OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye" and filed against src:debian-security-support, as openjdk-17 seems to be supported and src:debian-security-support's purpose is to documented what's unsupported. so, should I just close this bug? --=20 cheers, Holger =E2=A2=80=E2=A3=B4=E2=A0=BE=E2=A0=BB=E2=A2=B6=E2=A3=A6=E2=A0=80 =E2=A3=BE=E2=A0=81=E2=A2=A0=E2=A0=92=E2=A0=80=E2=A3=BF=E2=A1=81 holger@(d= ebian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org =E2=A2=BF=E2=A1=84=E2=A0=98=E2=A0=B7=E2=A0=9A=E2=A0=8B=E2=A0=80 OpenPGP: = B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C =E2=A0=88=E2=A0=B3=E2=A3=84 A ship is always safe at shore, but that is not what it's built for. (Albert Einstein) --vhFCHnfOgGuCMAFO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEuL9UE3sJ01zwJv6dCRq4VgaaqhwFAmH74EUACgkQCRq4Vgaa qhyDBg/+PB9F8oGPCfOAm40dEHBkPDesu0CK2jY96Jfqf1aCSpORUiDvrjUdX9VN TuNUWWZvjyljhdcD93s+3AcK6zp3SwlYLcuapoLmKqG25myT1SgsMH1xASgWVCo2 /8p4pCA/op13Mpu2jrhCLeLqRTl7YR1VQrHianv0pQXSaku/gx/5DPYnWnjucLCb UnOuX/dLkedYoLuaybnumL53r9SgA4Owl6euoFHmqF00ytCIBVqpKt28mPECcHp/ ZF6pUe9Ss4LcuxXsHbaut/MYpXDpV+FZ6owYomCSoUUbKpxG1aTeDQf/UU2qqbgC pdfSJaxT2E0Bg8rhe0/ELgFtf1KfcG3ackWj8nRHho/K1Te8K2t3qkI1eHJWVCOY tRh7eN0E9FFdUBgQ8RoRrsnVZDrCKSmsUgk4A9f3ObVuL94AsGmUO/f8+JYzpqxC jtYqJurWpDly4c7vJs1SAL7brfl3ndIFl6gUJEIvNmUTKACAnbJPDmXuCm7+2yo7 CvoG/ZMgNtInkVkmhlpRXHjY1Ih7TUygnoRYofeDuPuBZNU2oLYx5tyE2Ipjak2w ozUiH37SSd0D3j5AfO5v165iOv+IqQpC/tgLG1tdO5BlpQr9aPPnu8N7crmTh2TW US/+6KjzJ6Cpuz2hZ+MfofPHwDwUFEM70yMb2Oe2NNqvarNdyIg= =pH7i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vhFCHnfOgGuCMAFO--